지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 215 (215page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
1. Research background and objectives
The residents’ opposition to siting correctional facilities, probation and parole facilities (P&P facilities) have been around for a long time. However, the possibility of crime in society always exists and cannot be ruled out altogether. Therefore, we should prevent and suppress crimes and strengthen social safety with the help of correctional facilities and P&P facilities.
The correctional facilities and P&P facilities are non-preferred facilities that residents are reluctant to establish nearby their homes, even though they are nationally necessary facilities. As a result, social costs are increasing due to serious siting conflicts during policy implementation.
Because of this serious NIMBY syndrome, this research was conducted in order to provide policy implications for the preventive conflict managements of siting correctional facilities, probation and parole facilities (P&P facilities).
2. Research subjects and research methods
We did literature review, domestic and international cases studies, a residents’ perception survey, and expert and public official interviews on the siting conflicts on correctional and P&P facilities. For controlling the various characteristics of the siting conflicts, we only analyzed the facilities for adults: prison and jail (correctional facilities), probation and parole facilities.
3. Major Results
We analyzed siting conflict cases of the Seoul Southern Correctional Facility (2011), Yeoju P&P Facility (2013), and the Seoul Eastern Correctional Facility and P&P Facility (2017) which were relocated to Munjeong Legal Town together. The following suggestions have been drawn:
- The most important thing is active cooperation and efforts by the Ministry of Justice and local governments to resolve siting conflicts.
- The discussion and negotiation among the key stakeholders including the Ministry of Justice, local governments and related residents is needed in order to achieve what they want.
- Also securing budgets is important, so that the relocation & construction projects of the facility could be carried out quickly without delay after agreements between the key stakeholders is made.
A perception survey of 1,000 residents in Seoul was conducted from October 1 to October 16, 2018. The results show that people agreed that the facilities are essential for the crime prevention, but the majority disagreed if the facilities are siting in their residence. With these results, we could confirm that they are non-preferred facilities with NIMBY syndrome. And among a lot of factors, the immediate experiences about the facilities like visiting the facilities, using the resident convenient facilities for health care, parking sites etc. do lower the opposition on siting the facilities.
4. Suggestions for the policy improvements
In order to site the facilities more effectively, we made some suggestions: improve the legal systems like legislation of the conflict management act, siting conflicts management, and people’s perception of the facilities.
The residents’ opposition to siting correctional facilities, probation and parole facilities (P&P facilities) have been around for a long time. However, the possibility of crime in society always exists and cannot be ruled out altogether. Therefore, we should prevent and suppress crimes and strengthen social safety with the help of correctional facilities and P&P facilities.
The correctional facilities and P&P facilities are non-preferred facilities that residents are reluctant to establish nearby their homes, even though they are nationally necessary facilities. As a result, social costs are increasing due to serious siting conflicts during policy implementation.
Because of this serious NIMBY syndrome, this research was conducted in order to provide policy implications for the preventive conflict managements of siting correctional facilities, probation and parole facilities (P&P facilities).
2. Research subjects and research methods
We did literature review, domestic and international cases studies, a residents’ perception survey, and expert and public official interviews on the siting conflicts on correctional and P&P facilities. For controlling the various characteristics of the siting conflicts, we only analyzed the facilities for adults: prison and jail (correctional facilities), probation and parole facilities.
3. Major Results
We analyzed siting conflict cases of the Seoul Southern Correctional Facility (2011), Yeoju P&P Facility (2013), and the Seoul Eastern Correctional Facility and P&P Facility (2017) which were relocated to Munjeong Legal Town together. The following suggestions have been drawn:
- The most important thing is active cooperation and efforts by the Ministry of Justice and local governments to resolve siting conflicts.
- The discussion and negotiation among the key stakeholders including the Ministry of Justice, local governments and related residents is needed in order to achieve what they want.
- Also securing budgets is important, so that the relocation & construction projects of the facility could be carried out quickly without delay after agreements between the key stakeholders is made.
A perception survey of 1,000 residents in Seoul was conducted from October 1 to October 16, 2018. The results show that people agreed that the facilities are essential for the crime prevention, but the majority disagreed if the facilities are siting in their residence. With these results, we could confirm that they are non-preferred facilities with NIMBY syndrome. And among a lot of factors, the immediate experiences about the facilities like visiting the facilities, using the resident convenient facilities for health care, parking sites etc. do lower the opposition on siting the facilities.
4. Suggestions for the policy improvements
In order to site the facilities more effectively, we made some suggestions: improve the legal systems like legislation of the conflict management act, siting conflicts management, and people’s perception of the facilities.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[목차]
표 차례
그림 차례
[국문요약]
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구내용 및 방법
[제2장 교정보호시설 입지갈등에 관한 이론적 검토]
제1절 공공갈등으로서 교정보호시설 입지갈등
제2절 교정보호시설 입지갈등 선행연구
[제3장 해외 교정보호시설 입지갈등 관련 사례분석]
제1절 일본의 교정보호시설 입지갈등 사례분석
제2절 독일의 교정보호시설 입지갈등 사례분석
[제4장 국내 교정보호시설 현황 및 사례분석]
제1절 국내 교정보호시설 개관
제2절 국내 교정보호시설 입지갈등 사례분석
[제5장 교정보호시설에 대한 주민인식 조사결과]
제1절 설문조사 개요
제2절 분석결과
[제6장 결론]
제1절 교정보호시설 입지갈등 대응 개선방안
제2절 연구의 의의와 한계
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
시설관리 측면에서 바라본 국내 교정시설의 설계 시 고려사항에 대한 자료 도출 목적 연구
한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회지
2019 .01
-
대학 시설경영관리 능률향상을 위한 FM 항목분석
한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회지
2018 .01
-
주거지 주변 커뮤니티 시설의 비교분석과 사용자 수요조사
한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회지
2020 .01
-
비선호시설 수용성의 영향 요인 분석 : 교정보호시설을 중심으로
정책개발연구
2024 .06
-
대학 시설경영관리 능률향상을 위한 FM 항목분석
한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회지
2018 .12
-
그린케어(Green Care) 도입을 위한 시설과 프로그램 유형분류 및 중요도 분석
농촌계획
2019 .01
-
광주시 공공시설(문화 및 체육)의 효율적 관리운영 방안 연구
정책연구
2022 .11
-
AHP를 이용한 복합리조트 선택속성 우선순위도출에 관한 연구 : 아웃바운드 관광객을 중심으로
관광레저연구
2017 .11
-
도농공존거점공간으로의 폐교 활용방안 및 활성화 요인 분석
농촌계획
2022 .08
-
농촌지역 공동시설 저활용 원인에 대한 이해관계자별 인식비교 연구
농촌계획
2023 .02
-
철도시설이전사업의 효율적 개선 방안에 관한 연구 : 한국철도공사 사례를 중심으로
주거환경
2017 .09
-
서울시 공공환경시설 악취관리 강화 방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2016 .07
-
경기도 장기미집행 도시계획시설 해소를 위한중장기적 정책방향
정책연구
2017 .06
-
교정시설에 대한 수용도의 영향요인: 부산광역시 교정시설 입지 사례
지방행정연구
2024 .06
-
개인운영 장애인복지시설의 서비스 인식에 관한 연구 - 경기도 소재 장애인복지 시설을 중심으로 -
기업경영리뷰
2015 .01
-
2종 항만배후단지 입지시설의 법적 성격과 개발 활성화를 위한 개선방안
로지스틱스연구
2021 .12
-
유아기 자녀를 둔 북한이탈주민 어머니의 문화시설 이용 경험
한국보육지원학회지
2016 .01
-
거점면단위 마을종합개발사업 특성 사례분석-농촌 공공공간 및 시설을 중심으로-
농촌계획
2016 .01
-
문화관광시설 만족도와 인식 변화가 사업 지지도에 미치는 영향 연구: 문화시설확충 사업을 사례로
관광레저연구
2022 .09
-
농촌마을 커뮤니티시설 규모설정 요인분석- 농산어촌지역개발로 조성된 커뮤니티시설을 중심으로 -
농촌계획
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-364-000738147