메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
오채운 (녹색기술센터) 박순철 (한국생산기술연구원)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.10 No.2
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
129 - 143 (15page)
DOI
10.15531/ksccr.2019.10.2.129

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Under article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement, parties are given a flexible way to meet their nationally determined contribution (NDC) target by participating voluntarily in cooperative approaches and trading internationally transferred mitigation outcomes (ITMOs) in new climate regimes. Participating parties need to apply corresponding adjustment when accounting for the trading of ITMOs to avoid double counting. In the course of formulating guidance for the implementation of article 6.2 as a part of the Paris rule book, diverse methods for corresponding adjustment were suggested and explored. Korea has preferred a cumulative method by which a singular corresponding adjustment is applied at the end of NDC implementation year for the total amount of ITMOs first transferred and used, or transferred and acquired over the NDC implementation period. However, this method has met opposition from the perspective of lack of representativeness of NDC implementation and achievement. Furthermore, a phrase on consistency emerged to restrict the Parties participating in cooperative approaches to apply the same method consistently throughout the period for NDC implementation. Under the condition that Korea maintains its intention to utilize the cumulative method of corresponding adjustment with single year NDC targets, this research aims to explore argumentative logics that defend current critiques against the cumulative method. For this, the meaning of representativeness is classified into three interpretive dimensions on the basis of the existing literature and discussions being made at meetings by the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. For each interpretive dimension, defending logics are explored. We conclude by postulating some policy implications for the appropriate paths forward regarding Korea’s position on cooperative approaches in the future.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 배경
3. 대표성과 상응조정
4. 우리나라의 협상대응 전략 분석
5. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-453-000906550