메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Tabaré Fernández (Universidad de la Republica) Andrés Wilkins (Universidad de la República)
저널정보
부산외국어대학교 중남미지역원 이베로아메리카 이베로아메리카 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
159 - 206 (48page)
DOI
10.19058/iberoamerica.2019.06.21.1.159

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The objective of the article is to describe the social structure of Uruguay at the beginning of the sixties, presenting the social differences that configured the level of urban centers or localities since the beginning of the 20th century. The willing is to identify what historical processes would have intervened to have institutionalized a highly heterogeneous distribution of welfare in the territory.
The sources of information are four: (i) the population censuses of 1908 and 1963; (ii) the agricultural censuses of 1908, 1951, 1956 and 1961; (iii) the work of historical demography; and (iv) the indices published by the General Directorate of Statistics and Censuses in 1971 and 1989. Due to the lack of a dictionary of the localities, the authors matched these sources.
The regional configuration processes analyzed here are: the departmentalization of the territory; the agriculturization; the industrialization and the balnearización. In each case, the regional and local impact of the political, economic and social transformation is analyzed. The article dedicate a wide space to describe the changes in the entity, the legal status, the territorial distribution and the wellbeing of the localities, marking especially those under 1500 inhabitants, which make up an important micro-urbanization of the country.
The foundation of 70% of the localities occurred during the reformist period that locates that project as a type of “social democratic” State with its “Bismarkian” type traits. The institutionalization of these territories is based on their precarious and very poor character, the inequality in the most elementary welfare enjoyed by the established towns and cities increases.
The processes of spatialization that reconfigured the territory during this time, contributed to the urbanization and population relocation, but in a framework in the political project of the “small model country” did not plan on the territory, the state have no special attention to correct the asymmetries in local welfare distribution structures.
We finished with the hypothesis that beyond the social advances of the “Battlista” period, the territorial inequality of opportunities has grown between 1908 and 1963 because the lack of a public planification.

목차

〈Abstract〉
Ⅰ. Objetivo, problema y contexto histórico
Ⅱ. Desigualdad, historia y espacio
Ⅲ. Datos y métodos
Ⅳ. Cinco procesos de espacialización social(1900-1960)
Ⅴ. Las localidades de Uruguay en 1960: la expansión micro-urbana
Ⅵ. Discusion de hipotesis y conclusiones
Bibliografía
〈Resumen〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-030-000924875