지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to investigate how Korean EFL speakers understand conversational implicatures. Although EFL speakers may have an advanced level of grammatical knowledge, they sometimes experience communicative difficulty with speakers from English speaking countries. This is mainly because EFL speakers lack knowledge of conversational implicatures in learners' communicative competence. In this study, participants were divided into two groups (group A and B). Group A consisted of 44 subjects (24 males and 20 females) who stayed in English speaking countries for less than 3 years, while group B consisted of 33 subjects (13 males and 20 females) who stayed in English speaking countries for more than 3 years. Four types of implicature were used: Pope Q, relevance, indirect criticism, and the minimum requirement rule (MRR). The three research hypotheses for this study were as follows: First, residence in an English speaking environment positively influenced understanding of conversational implicatures. Second, "indirect criticism" and "pope Q" are the most difficult types of implicature to interpret for Koreans. Third, females are better than males in understanding implicature.
The results of this study indicated that the duration of residence in English speaking countries was positively correlated with understanding conversational implicature. The study also showed that the most difficult types of conversational implicature for Koreans were the "minimum requirement rule" and "indirect criticism," and that the difference of gender in the performance of conversational implicature was statistically insignificant (p=.497).
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
Bouton,L. / 1988 / A cross-cultural study of the ability to interpret implicatures in English / World Englishes 7 (2) : 183 ~ 196
Bouton,L. / 1999 / Developing nonnative speaker skills in interpreting conversational implicatures in English.?In Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning / Cambridge University
Garcia,P. / 2004 / Pragmatic Comprehension of High and Low Language Learners / TESL-EJ 8 (2)
Grice,H. / 1989 / Studies in the Ways of Words / Harvard University Press
Grice,P. / 1975 / Logic ad Conversational Implicature.In Syntax and Semantics / Academic Press : 411 ~ 458
Bouton,L. / 1999 / Developing nonnative speaker skills in interpreting conversational implicatures in English.?In Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning / Cambridge University
Garcia,P. / 2004 / Pragmatic Comprehension of High and Low Language Learners / TESL-EJ 8 (2)
Grice,H. / 1989 / Studies in the Ways of Words / Harvard University Press
Grice,P. / 1975 / Logic ad Conversational Implicature.In Syntax and Semantics / Academic Press : 411 ~ 458
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
함축을 기반으로 한 중국어 시트콤 담화 분석Ⅱ － 함축의 자질 및 참가자의 연령을 중심으로 －
한중언어문화연구
2017 .01
-
L2 Learners’ Comprehension of Conversational Implicatures
영어교과교육
2019 .01
-
Implicature and Process Leading to Implicature
영어영문학연구
2005 .01
-
한국어 학습자의 함축 해석 능력에 대한 연구 - 한국어 모어 화자와의 비교․대조를 중심으로
이중언어학
2016 .01
-
『금강반야바라밀경(金剛般若波羅蜜經)』 번역에 나타난 함축 고찰
통번역교육연구
2014 .01
-
광고어의 함축과 그 추론과정
어문연구
2005 .01
-
간접화행과 대화함축의 비교·분석
영어영문학
2003 .02
-
Some, Possible and Or : Reflections of the Nature of Implicature
언어
1980 .12
-
국어학에서의 함의와 함축
국어문학
2010 .02
-
제주 방언에서 화행과 함축의 특성
언어과학연구
2003 .06
-
한국어의 대용어 해석과 대화 함축
담화와인지
1998 .06
-
The Pragmatic Inference Processes of Quantity Information in Generalized Conversational Implicature
언어
2005 .03
-
공감적 소통 능력 신장을 위한 화법 교육 방안 : ‘대화 함축’ 교육을 중심으로
국어문학
2015 .11
-
Some Observations on Implicature in Causatives
담화와인지
1996 .09
-
고정함축 논의의 흐름과 쟁점들
언어학 연구
2018 .10
-
On the Status of Conventional Implicature
영어학연구
2013 .01
-
항진 명제 발화의 해석에 대한 재검토
담화와인지
2009 .08
-
A Study of Non-logical Inference Structure : Q-and R-implicatures
어학연구
1994 .12
-
The Acquisition of Korean Scalar Implicature of -to "even"
언어과학연구
2012 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0