메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제27권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
155 - 203 (49page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A party in a contract should perform the duty of the contract. The duty of contract consists of main performance obligation, collateral obligation and protective obligation. Main performance obligation corresponds to the duty which determines the substance and nature of a contract. In case when main performance obligation is infringed, it can enforce the performance of the contract, and the compensation for the breach of contract and cancellation of the contract are admitted. And collateral obligation is the duty for the purpose of protecting benefits of a contract. Although there is an argument whether to classify performance obligation into main performance obligation and collateral obligation or not, these are distinguished from each other in this study. That is because unlike infringing main performance obligation, violating collateral obligation is not allowed to enforce to perform or cancel the contract. It is only allowed to claim damage reparations. Also, a duty of safety is not based on the party’s will, but on forced obligation in accordance with good faith and fair dealing. And unlike the collateral obligation, the duty of safety aims at protecting another party’s integrity or existing interest. But, in case of violating the duty of safety, it is not allowed to force the performance of duty, but is only allowed to claim for damage reparations. This kind of duty of safety holds good from the process of negotiating a contract, through the process of realization of the contract,after the extinguishment of the contract. Also, a third party beside the party involved in the contract can the person concerned of protective obligation. However, even though these have the same substance, a duty to give attention to and protective obligation should be distinguished. The reason is that among the duties to give attention to, there is a case which belongs to performance obligation that entails a certain legal relation like labor contracts. Also, even if both of them accompany legal benefits, the transit security duty of tort law and the protective obligation of contract law should be distinguished. The party who is damaged by violating duty of safety, rather than the party who is damaged by infringing transit security duty, is able to receive remedy for the right according to legal principles of contract liability,which is superior in aspects of responsibility for proof or extinctive prescription. In the meantime, the obligation of contract as above belongs to the substance of a obligation, so violating it is applicable to non-fulfillment. Then it takes different remedies according to the case of non-fulfillment; delay in performance, non-impossibility and imperfect performance. Also it takes different requirement according to the ways of remedy for the right; forcing the performance of obligation, claiming compensation for the damage or canceling a contract. Especially, in case that excessive damage beyond benefits of a contract is incurred because of non-impossibility and imperfect performance, there is no room for claiming forced performance or canceling a contract. And unlike forced performance, in order to claim compensation for the damage, the damage due to the breach of contract should be incurred because of the reason that obligor can be blamed of. Besides, in case of canceling the contract, obligor should be responsible for that. However, in occasion of delay in performance, it is allowed to cancel the contract only when it doesn't perform the obligation of contract within a grace period. Of course, in case that obligation of a onerous contract is imperfectly performed, damaged party can claim responsibility about warranties liability of non-negligence.
#행위의무 #거래안전의무 #주된 급부의무 #부수적 의무 #보호의무 #채무불이행 #강제이행 #손해배상 #계약의 해제 #계약책임 #계약체결상의 과실책임 #채무불이행책임 #불법행위책임 등 #Duty to Act Carefully #Transit Security Duty #Duty to Provide Information #Main Performance Obligation #Collateral Obligation #Protective Obligation #Non-Fulfillment of Obligation #Cancellation of Contract #Contract Liability #Culpa in Contrahendo #Liability for Non-Fulfillment of Obligation #Tort Liability #etc

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (57)

참고문헌 신청
朴奎龍 / 2003 / 契約責任에 있어서 第3者의 保護 / 저스티스 73 (73) : 76 ~ 94 dbpia 朴正基 / 2002 / 契約締結過程에 있어서의 情報提供義務 / 토지법학 18 : 65 ~ 80 google schola 고상룡 / 1990 / 민법 제390조의 채무불이행의 의미 / 해배상법의 제문제(성헌황적인박사화갑기념논문집) google schola 곽윤직 / 1995 / 채권각론(신정판) / 박영사 google schola 곽윤직 / 2004 / 채권총론(제6판) / 박영사 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0