지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the digital age, through machine learning, corporations have improved their ability to collect, restore, and analyze information on customers, competitors, and the market in general. Based on cumulative data, these corporations have highly sophisticated algorithms that can set prices of their goods and services. Due to the algorithms that can proceed data and conduct autonomous decision-making capability, it is crucial to collect data on consumers and competitors. Based on these algorithms, it is possible to monitor consumers and competitors, and to recognize changes of market situations in real time. On the one hand, algorithms bring positive effects in numerous cases. On the other hand, the prevalent use of algorithms can create a substantial risk in fair and efficient competition in the market. Recently, in this respect, the OECD and competition agencies of many jurisdictions have discussed the impact of algorithms’ automatic price setting on the competition in the market. Regarding the issue of algorithms’ automatic price-setting, an influential view is that the price-setting technology in itself does not constitute a violation of competition law. So far, a majority view seems to explain that consent among competing business entities is a required component for a violation of competition law. However, if computer algorithms become more developed and autonomous in the near future, a crucial question of competition law will lie concerning the meaning of consent among competing business entities. In this respect, it is a high time to consider whether core standards of the current competition law such as a business entity’s awareness should be maintained as the standards under the circumstances where technologies and machines are dominant in setting business strategies. Therefore, in carrying out competition policies, it is necessary for the judiciary and competition agencies in the government to consider and examine the interpretation of “consent” and “intent” in accordance with the current and future technology.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
알고리즘을 통한 가격정보의 교환과 경쟁법적 평가
경쟁법연구
2017 .05
-
알고리즘을 이용한 담합의 규제
경쟁법연구
2019 .01
-
Challenges and changes for competition authorities during and post COVID-19
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2020 .06
-
The Meaning of Fair Trade Law in the Ḥisbah System: A Comparative Perspective
중동문제연구
2019 .01
-
판례에 나타난 공정거래법상 경쟁 및 경쟁제한성의 개념과 기준
사법
2024 .03
-
Analysis of Competition Policies between U.S. and EU in the Era of Inter-Industry Convergence
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2021 .04
-
Intellectual Property and Competition Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
European Competition Law Annual 2013: Effective and Legitimate Enforcement of Competition Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
Competition On the Internet
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
Competition on the internet
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
Achieving Inclusive and Innovative Growth with Competition Policies
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2022 .01
-
2019년 경쟁법 중요판례평석
인권과 정의
2020 .01
-
EU의 제약산업에 대한 경쟁법 집행 및 경쟁정책과 그 시사점
한국비교정부학보
2019 .01
-
Innovation and Competition: A Case Study Analysis
KIET Industrial Economic Review
2022 .12
-
Competition Law in Singapore
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
The Harmonization of Competition Laws towards the ASEAN Economic Integration
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
2017 .05
-
The Future of Asian Competition Law - A Proposal for Modernisation -
동북아법연구
2018 .01
-
The Recent Enforcement of Competition Law Damages Actions in the European Union
EU연구
2015 .01
-
Competition Law and Intellectual Property in China
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2019 .12
-
The Formation and Development of EU Competition Law
경쟁법연구
2015 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0