메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
통일연구원 International Journal of Korean Unification Studies International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 제13권 제1호
발행연도
2004.1
수록면
59 - 84 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
North Korea restarted its nuclear reactor in Yongbyon and expelled IAEA inspectors in December 2002. In coping with the North Korean challenge, the Bush administration initially devised a plan to apply an increased international diplomatic isolation and economic pressure on North Korea, called ‘tailored containment.’ Washington’s preoccupation with a possible war against Iraq, however, has limited U.S. options in dealing with North Korea. Consequently, the U.S. stressed the primacy of diplomacy to resolve the crisis. At the six-party talks, North Korea demanded a non-aggression pact, political normalization, and economic aid in return for the dismantling of its nuclear weapon program; The U.S. urged the North to take a first step for a complete and verifiable dismantlement of its nuclear program. The six-party talks laid a foundation to maintain the dialogue momentum, but the U.S. and North Korea failed to narrow their differences. Disappointed by the Bush administration’s ineffective North Korean policy, liberal and conservative intellectuals suggest their policy recommendations respectively. The divergent recommendations suggested by these intellectuals can be arranged broadly into two contending options: negotiated settlement and regime change.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0