메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한남대학교 과학기술법연구원 과학기술법연구 과학기술법연구 제15권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
263 - 291 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Law of the Sea Convention, which was adopted in 1982 by the 3rd United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, has been called the "Constitution of the Oceans." This Convention not only extended maritime jurisdiction of coastal states through newly codified EEZ and Continental Shelf, but also adopted provisions on marine environmental protection and preservation. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea(ITLOS) was established by the Law of the Sea Convention. However, since its establishment, the ITLOS has heard only 15 cases for the past 13 years. Most of the cases were brought by the owners or flag states of the ships which were captured by a coastal state. On the other hand, there were 3 marine environmental cases including the Case Concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor between Malaysia and Singapore(The Reclamation case). Malaysia requested the ITLOS provisional measures before the constitution of arbitral court. In its order, however, the ITLOS advised close cooperation between the states parties to the dispute. It advised also to form a Group of Experts to study the environmental impacts caused by the reclamation works by Singapore and to facilitate exchange of information between them. This practical and soft approach adopted by the Tribunal was proved to be useful in solving the dispute. Based on the study submitted by the Group of Experts, Malaysia and Singapore negotiated and reached an agreement to settle their dispute. In the Reclamation case, the applicant had not deep concern on environmental protection. But the ITLOS viewed the case mainly from the perspectives of marine environmental protection. Although the states parties to the dispute anticipated all or nothing decision on the case, ITLOS opted soft and practical method. These are why we are expecting more meaningful role from the ITLOS in the future.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0