메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제33권 제1호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
235 - 281 (47page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is to study the normative characters and the issue of the effectiveness of the law of modern armed conflicts. The study shows the following areas. 1) The law of armed conflicts is composed of the law of belligerence and the law of neutrality. Today, under the UN system, a war is illegal. Therefore. instead of the word 'the law of war', it's called the law of armed conflicts or the international humanitarian law. And the law of armed conflicts is about two different laws which are the legality of war (jus ad bellum) and the method of war (jus in bello). Nowadays, the law about the method of war (jus in bello) has been developed and improved highly. 2) Based on the basic structural analysis, the normative characters of the law of armed conflicts are analyzed. The law of armed conflicts is based on the two conflicting elements, the military necessity and the principle of humanity. In the past, the military necessity was more important, but in modern international society, the principle of humanity has become far more important. Therefore, the Hague Law with emphasis on military necessity and the Geneva Law with the principle of humanity are becoming united. And we can see that many of these normative laws have become customized. Especially, this unification phenomenon is very clear in the 1977's 1st Geneva additional protocol to the Geneva Conventions. As a result, the prohibitive elements of the war reprisal have become a lot more widened. This is the way of securing the execution of the law of armed conflicts, and takes away the right to the war reprisal which has been permitted to the belligerent countries until now. Related to the problem of securing the effectiveness of the law of armed conflicts, it suggests a very important issue. 3) Here, in this third area of the study, securing the binding force of the law of armed conflicts, Wirksamkeit and war reprisal as argument points are analyzed. First of all, the problem of Wirksamkeit can not be acknowledged. Like what J. Westlake said, the laws of war are the product of the compromise between military necessity and humanitarian principle. Here, the military necessity is already considered, so the meaning of making the law of armed conflicts vanishes if the rules of war are abandoned by the military necessity. Merely, the military necessity should be recognized only in case of confirming it as the international customary laws and of permitting it as the treaties. In this way, Wirksamkeit could be separated the classical(or broad) one from the modern(or narrow) one which means the military necessity; accordingly, in modern case, the latter should be accepted. And concerning the military necessity, some scholars insist that the anticipatory self-defence should be admitted, but it is not easy to permit this when the abuse of the right of self-defence is considered, even in the interpretation of the UN Charter. On the other hand, for the problem of the war reprisal, there's a tremendous conflict between pros and cons. However, in reality, as the system of the compulsory enforcement of the international law is weak, the war reprisal must be permitted only when it has the appropriate conditions. Therefore, in conclusion, to increase the effectiveness of the law of armed conflicts, the content of deeds norms should be broadened for belligerent countries as well as the process of securing the execution should be improved. And the constituents of the international society, individuals as well as countries, need a firm will to abide by the law of armed conflicts.
#무력충돌법 #실효성 #군사적 필요성 #상호주의 #Hague법 #Geneva법 #대항조치 #Law of Armed Conflicts #Wirksamkeit / Effectiveness #General Participation Clause #Kriegsraison #Military Necessity #War #belligerent) Reprisal #Reciprocity #Hague Law #Geneva Law #Countermeasures

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (56)

참고문헌 신청
Bernhardt, Rudolf / 1999 / Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol.Ⅱ / North-Holland google schola Bishop, William W. / 1971 / International Law: Case and Materials, 3rd ed. / Little and Company google schola Detter, Ingrid / 2000 / The Law of War, 2nd ed / Cambridge University Press google schola Dinstein, Yoram / 1994 / War Aggression and Self-Defence, 2nd ed / Cambridge University Press google schola Dinstein, Yoram / 1997 / Military Necessity / EPIL 3 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0