메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제33권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
527 - 555 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In terms of the annals of legislations, more specifically, Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter "IACIA") becomes the root of the social insurance law and is naturally bound up with labor relations as called Workers’ Compensation Act. Moreover the development of industrial technology and the atmospheric shifts of labor market brought new kinds of industrial accidents. Hence, IACIA is the foremost challenge that we face to keep social security laws abreast of the changes in the labor market. To cope with these novel issues, social welfare system is now forced to innovate not only in its structures but also in its legal frames. Particularly, due to the idiosyncrasy of new occupational diseases, the burden to establish the legal elements of "occupational" in the IACIA has been graver. Besides, due to the mental or physical overloads, new species of disease surfaced. The pre-existing theories or the industrial standards of the occupational hazards have revealed the limitations. To meet the legal elements of occupational disease, including causation, a discussion on the new definition of "occupational" has been called for. To begin with, the norm of employment in the IACIA constructs the basis to the legal definition of "occupational," which is the performance of the insured what the law is to protect. Employment means the work for which one has been hired and is being paid by an employer. In other words, it indicates the performance arising out of a work contract, contributing to a workplace, carrying out the employer’s instructions, and what the IACIA meant to protect in the end. Unfortunately, it is not easy to discern whether the employment has been provided in pursuit of the employer’s benefit for the purpose of determining the new species of occupational diseases. Neither is it always clear to say that such action is foreseeable in the course of employment to the extent that both parties to the work contract would have agreed upon. Namely, the action of the insured, which is subject to the IACIA, should be considered differently from the employee’s responsibility for his decision or from the legal elements of his liability. This thesis shows that the accident in the IACIA is the subject of protection for the applicable party by distributing his accountability to others, not the subject of personal liability by having the said party held responsible. This joint liability principle is explained with the social welfare aspectsof the workers’ compensation, thereupon this study argues that the legal aspects of the IACIA also be coherently construed in that sense. The workers’compensation laws will continue to call for consistent changes and responses to them to meet the practical needs. In such changes, this study also contemplates on the apportioning manner of burden of proof and on the norms of employees an actor of the IACIA at the same time. Not until are these legal questions answered, the genuine protection from the industrial accidents, the original statutory purpose of the IACIA, may be far-fetched.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0