메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
21세기영어영문학회 영어영문학21 영어영문학21 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
65 - 80 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is an essay about the deterrritorialization of Hamlet's madness in Hamlet. His madness has been generally interpreted as his helpless and hopeless anxiety. Critics and readers have criticized him as vacillating and indeterminate. Many psycho-analysts have regarded Hamlet in dilemma as caged in a paranoiac and oedipalized state. If Gilles Deleuze's terms are employed to illuminate Hamlet's madness, a new argument will be made that Hamlet's madness results in a more creative achievement because his madness is a deterritorialized desiring machine to generate schizophrenic power and potential. Ghost of King Hamlet is an effective medium by which Hamlet's infantile subconscious is motivated to stretch into the mature domain of truth and fact. Through the ghost's appearance, Hamlet begins to strengthen the force of his internal desire to find out who is the murderer of King Hamlet. The new interpretation of Hamlet's madness subverts the conventional one in that his madness is acknowledged to be active and positive. And the interpretation deconstructs the paranoiac oedipal structure built by the conservative interpretive community of Hamlet. Accordingly, a black or white question whether Hamlet is mad or not might be avoided. Being creative and critical, Hamlet is schizophrenically engrossed in his quest for truth and fact as a deterritorialized subject on a line of flight.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0