지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The current essay has attempted to make a comparative analysis on the problem of thinking between Shakespeare's Hamlet and Tennyson's Maud. For an understanding of the drama Hamlet, as it “makes the play what it is” (Zhang 292), it is important to examine Hamlet’s thinking. Around the time when Hamlet was written, some doubts over human thinking prevailed, although ‘the power of thinking’ is still considered as a core requirement for a man to be entitled as a human being. Such a complicated attribute of human being, i.e. thinking was reflected in Hamlet with a focus on skepticism on thinking. Hamlet himself expressed his doubt on his own thinking in his attempt to gain the validity of the Ghost's reference. Hamlet's questions and reconsiderations of his own thinking, the incomprehensibility of the ghost within human understanding, and Hamlet's wrong judgement and misinterpretation of other people's behavior seemed to indicate Shakespeare's skepticism on human thinking. The most skeptical side on human thinking in Hamlet was represented by Hamlet's solipsism with his own thinking. His thinking on his father's death and his mother's sudden marriage to his own uncle whom he considers inferior to his father cast him into melancholy, pessimistic view toward life, misogyny, and even to death wish. Overwhelmed with his solipsism he was almost driven to insaneness.
Tennyson's Maud is a monodrama where a melancholic monomania akin to Hamlet suffered from solipsism with his own thinking. Maud has several things common to Hamlet in that the death of the speaker's father traumatized him and eventually caused him to be isolated from the society and to suffer in melancholia. To note, the strong skepticism of obsessive thinking was more highlighted in Maud than that in Hamlet. Maud's speaker can be considered as a Tennysonian type of Hamlet considering that Tennyson referred to Maud as “Little Hamlet”. To him, Hamlet was a character who suffered from inner pain raised by his obsessive way of thinking and he created a Hamlet-type character in Maud. Through the character, he seemed to raise the problem of solipsistic way of thinking which was more intense than Hamlet's.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - Armstrong, Isobel / 1993 / Victorian Poetry / Routledge
[단행본] - Culler, Dwight A. / 1977 / The Poetry of Tennyson / Yale UP
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Geric, Michelle / 2014 / Reading Maud's Remains: Tennyson, Geological Processes, and Palacontological Reconstructions / Victorian Literature and Culture 42 : 58 ~ 79
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Haverkamp, Anslem / 2006 / The Ghost of History: Hamlet and the Politics of Paternity / Law and Literature 18 (2) : 171 ~ 197
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Hui, Andrew / 2013 / Horatio's Philosophy in Hamlet / Renaissance Drama 4 : 151 ~ 171
[단행본] - Culler, Dwight A. / 1977 / The Poetry of Tennyson / Yale UP
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Geric, Michelle / 2014 / Reading Maud's Remains: Tennyson, Geological Processes, and Palacontological Reconstructions / Victorian Literature and Culture 42 : 58 ~ 79
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Haverkamp, Anslem / 2006 / The Ghost of History: Hamlet and the Politics of Paternity / Law and Literature 18 (2) : 171 ~ 197
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Hui, Andrew / 2013 / Horatio's Philosophy in Hamlet / Renaissance Drama 4 : 151 ~ 171
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
호두 껍데기, 자궁, 그리고 햄릿의 감옥?<햄릿>과 매큐언의 <호두 껍데기>
영어영문학21
2021 .12
-
햄릿에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제
고전 르네상스 영문학
2015 .01
-
햄릿의 절대 주체로서의 “나”
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
햄릿과 그의 세계 : 하이데거의 『존재와 시간』을 통한 실존론적 존재론 고찰
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
『햄릿』의 각색과 영화적 변용
국제언어문학
2017 .04
-
『햄릿』에서 <햄릿>으로 : 디지털 콘텐츠로 읽는 햄릿의 재해석 작업 비교 연구
동서비교문학저널
2016 .03
-
Hamlet and Turnus Compared: Their Views of Death
고전 르네상스 영문학
2017 .06
-
발터 벤야민, 칼 슈미트, 『햄릿』―‘주권’사상을 중심으로
현대영어영문학
2015 .01
-
양정웅과 스티븐 그린블랏: 애도극으로 『햄릿』 읽기
고전 르네상스 영문학
2016 .12
-
색채의 상징성과 플롯 변형: <야연>(The Banquet)과 『햄릿』(Hamlet)의 비교분석
Shakespeare Review
2024 .06
-
Hamlet's (Un)manly Grief: the Cult of the Past in the Age of Theatrical Power
영미문화
2017 .01
-
『햄릿』영화들과 정동
새한영어영문학
2016 .02
-
코울리지의 햄릿 이미지
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
The Legality of Hamlet’s Modern Revenge
Shakespeare Review
2021 .10
-
『햄릿』에서 죽음을 통한 오필리아의 역할
새한영어영문학
2022 .11
-
『햄릿』에서의 복수의 불가능성과 경제적 무의식
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
An Existentialist Revision of Shakespeare’s Skepticism in Hamlet, the Walking Man
Shakespeare Review
2024 .06
-
합리적 개인주의 : 『줄리어스 시저』와 『햄릿』에 나타난 주체 형성하기
동서비교문학저널
2018 .09
-
앨머레이더의 <햄릿>에 나타난 미디어 테크놀로지
영어영문학
2015 .02
-
셰익스피어, 오늘을 이야기하다: 할리우드에서 부활한 『햄릿』
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
엘리엇(T. S. Eliot)의 셰익스피어 비평 : 『햄릿』은 예술적 실패작인가?
김종환
Shakespeare Review
2008
.12
햄릿과 오필리아의 관계 : 수녀원 장면과 극중극 장면을 중심으로
최민경
Shakespeare Review
2007
.12
햄릿과 그의 세계 : 하이데거의 『존재와 시간』을 통한 실존론적 존재론 고찰
윤희억
Shakespeare Review
2015
.03
영국 르네상스 복수비극의 전복적 욕망
강석주
Shakespeare Review
2010
.12
『햄릿』에 나타난 르네상스 개인주의
한정이
Shakespeare Review
2010
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-740-000701917