메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
미래영어영문학회 영어영문학 영어영문학 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2016.2
수록면
83 - 109 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The current essay has attempted to make a comparative analysis on the problem of thinking between Shakespeare's Hamlet and Tennyson's Maud. For an understanding of the drama Hamlet, as it “makes the play what it is” (Zhang 292), it is important to examine Hamlet’s thinking. Around the time when Hamlet was written, some doubts over human thinking prevailed, although ‘the power of thinking’ is still considered as a core requirement for a man to be entitled as a human being. Such a complicated attribute of human being, i.e. thinking was reflected in Hamlet with a focus on skepticism on thinking. Hamlet himself expressed his doubt on his own thinking in his attempt to gain the validity of the Ghost's reference. Hamlet's questions and reconsiderations of his own thinking, the incomprehensibility of the ghost within human understanding, and Hamlet's wrong judgement and misinterpretation of other people's behavior seemed to indicate Shakespeare's skepticism on human thinking. The most skeptical side on human thinking in Hamlet was represented by Hamlet's solipsism with his own thinking. His thinking on his father's death and his mother's sudden marriage to his own uncle whom he considers inferior to his father cast him into melancholy, pessimistic view toward life, misogyny, and even to death wish. Overwhelmed with his solipsism he was almost driven to insaneness. Tennyson's Maud is a monodrama where a melancholic monomania akin to Hamlet suffered from solipsism with his own thinking. Maud has several things common to Hamlet in that the death of the speaker's father traumatized him and eventually caused him to be isolated from the society and to suffer in melancholia. To note, the strong skepticism of obsessive thinking was more highlighted in Maud than that in Hamlet. Maud's speaker can be considered as a Tennysonian type of Hamlet considering that Tennyson referred to Maud as “Little Hamlet”. To him, Hamlet was a character who suffered from inner pain raised by his obsessive way of thinking and he created a Hamlet-type character in Maud. Through the character, he seemed to raise the problem of solipsistic way of thinking which was more intense than Hamlet's.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-740-000701917