메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 역사연구소 史叢(사총) 史叢(사총) 제68호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
257 - 304 (48page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study analyzed how Korean history in Chinese modern history is described in university history textbooks in Taiwan. The history of Korean- Chinese relation in Chinese modern history includes the Ganghwa-do Incident, Ganghwa-do Treaty, Korean soldier’s riot in 1882, Gapsin Coup in 1884, Donghak Peasants’ Revolution, and Sino-Japanese War. Accordingly, this study examined Korea-related descriptions found in textbooks ‘Chinese Modern History’ and ‘Complete Chinese History,’ diving them by themes. The characteristics of the descriptions can be summarized as follows. First, Chinese relation with Joseon is described in connection with Japanese invasion of China and the negotiation of China and Japan over Joseon. In the contents, Joseon is described as a tributary nation of China as a suzerain state, and it is maintained consistently from the beginning to the end that China protected Joseon from Japanese invasion by sending its troops. However, Joseon’s independent reaction and position are not mentioned. Second, Gapsin Coup in 1884 is explained mistakenly. Gapsin Coup in 1884 is described as a revolt resulting from the irrationalities of pro-Japanese enlightenment group and King Gojong’s blind following. For instance, it is stated that in 1884 the rioters in Joseon raised a rebellion in collusion with Japan, and the rebellion was suppressed by Chinese troops. No consideration is given to the formation of the enlightenment group in Joseon, the outline of policies in the Gapsin Coup, the meaning and evaluation of the coup, etc. Third, the Donghak Party and Donghak Peasants’ Revolution are not described correctly. Donghak Peasants’ Revolution is called ‘the Donghak Party’s uprising’ and the Donghak Party is understood wrongly to be pro-Japanese. Although the Sino-Japanese War was for taking the initiative over Joseon, China’s response is explained as an action for protecting Joseon as a tributary state and Japanese invasion is emphasized. During the period from 1885 when Yuan Shi Kai came to Joseon right before the Sino-Japanese War, China’s ‘imperialistic’ interference with Joseon was most oppressive but it is not described in detail. Fourth, when these descriptions are compared with Chinese university history textbooks, the degree of distortion is much more serious. For example, Chinese university history textbooks mention the meaning and evaluation of the Gapsin Coup in 1884 and Donghak Peasants’ Revolution. Of course, this is related to the tendency of Chinese historians who interpret China modern history as the history of anti-imperialistic and anti-feudal struggles. Nevertheless, Taiwanese university history textbooks mention Joseon only from the aspect of Chinese-Japanese negotiation and the two countries’ actions, emphasizing China as ‘protector’ and Japan as ‘invader’ and depreciating and distorting the meanings of Gapsin Coup in 1884, Donghak Peasants’ Revolution, etc., which are important incidents in Korean modern history. Fifth, different from Taiwanese university history textbooks, Korean university history textbooks overemphasize Joseon’s independent reactions and its position. Korea modern history is virtually the history of Korean-Chinese- Japanese relations. As confirmed in Taiwanese university history textbooks, Korean-Chinese and Korean-Japanese relations are closely interconnected to Chinese-Japanese relations. However, Korean university history textbooks hardly deal with Chinese-Japanese negation over Korea. Thus, it is considered necessary to promote exchange between the two countries, to understand each other’s history, and to make efforts to correct distorted historical facts.
#대만의 대학 역사교재 #중국통사 #중국근대사 #강화도사건 #강화도조약 #임오군란 #갑신정변 #동학농민혁명 #청일전쟁 #University history textbooks in Taiwan #Ganghwa-do Incident #Ganghwa-do Treaty #Korean soldier's riot in 1882 #Gapsin Coup in 1884 #Donghak Peasants' Revolution #1st Sino-Japanese War

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청
傅樂成 / / 中國通史(下) : 807 ~ 808 google schola 張玉法 / / 中國近代現代史 : 81 ~ 82 google schola 彭明輝 / 2002 / 臺灣史學的中國?結 / 麥田出版 google schola 王壽南 / / 中國通史 : 543 ~ google schola 王晴佳 / 2002 / 臺灣史學50年(1950~2000)?傳統, 方法, 趨向 / 麥田出版 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0