지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The problem of gloomy past history of Korea and Japan became the source of conflict and antagonism due to the conflicting perception of history in both country. Since 2001, the 'Husosha' textbook written by 'New history textbook producers' meeting' justified the Japanese behavior of invasion rather than reflecting the modern Japanese history dotted with invasion and rule to neighboring countries. Korean history textbook also has limitation in aiming at the historical perception based on the native land-oriented nationalistic viewpoint, the same as the distorted Japanese history textbook though its form is different.
In this respect, this study analyzes the relationship between Korea and Japan described in the middle school history textbooks in Korea and Japan. The problems in the history education in both countries and in describing history textbooks are examined. To solve the problems. 'History Opening the Future' textbook written by Korea China Japan Common History Compilation Committee to formulate the Eastern Asia Community 1S reviewed.
Analysis of the relationship between Korea and Japan in modern times described in the history textbooks of Japan showed both a positive and negative change. As for positive change, description of Japanese history textbooks about the relationship between Korea and Japan in modern times has been improved little by little. As for negative change, the Husosha textbook appeared in 2001 reflected the conservative right force's distorted perception of history, as it is, to the description of textbook. In describing the modern relation between Korea and Japan and the past war of invasion, it reduced and concealed the violent fact and interpreted the history in narrow-minded and native land-oriented viewpoint. Moreover, the Husosha textbook lowered the rate of selection of the textbook that described Japanese blame and responsibility for the invasion war and war crimes.
Analysis of the relationship between Korea and Japan in modern times described in the history textbooks of Korea showed in general the nation and state-oriented description of history The Korean history textbook abused the word 'nation', with its concept not yet defined, and beautified excessively the native people who resisted against Japanese invasion and exploitation. On the other hand, in the section of national campaign, there is hardly no mention about socialists' national campaign, but bourgeois national campaign-oriented. This shows the limitation of the description that aims at bourgeois nationalism. This is a problem related with the government authorization system of Korean history textbook.
On the contrary, the 'History Opening the Future' textbook that gives a historical message of peace and coexistence through the realistic description of the miserable history in the standpoint of reflection and reconciliation presents a direction of history education movement for formulating the Eastern Asia Community. Therefore like the publication of textbook, the 'History Opening the Future', a civil solidarity based on the shared mutual understanding and historical recognition in the private level can be enlarged to the political and economical sphere. Furthermore, it is necessary in state level to formulate an international order that enables coexistence beyond the pursuit of native land-oriented profit and the national boundary. It will become a right path enabling the formulation of future-oriented and abundant Eastern Asia Community.
In this respect, this study analyzes the relationship between Korea and Japan described in the middle school history textbooks in Korea and Japan. The problems in the history education in both countries and in describing history textbooks are examined. To solve the problems. 'History Opening the Future' textbook written by Korea China Japan Common History Compilation Committee to formulate the Eastern Asia Community 1S reviewed.
Analysis of the relationship between Korea and Japan in modern times described in the history textbooks of Japan showed both a positive and negative change. As for positive change, description of Japanese history textbooks about the relationship between Korea and Japan in modern times has been improved little by little. As for negative change, the Husosha textbook appeared in 2001 reflected the conservative right force's distorted perception of history, as it is, to the description of textbook. In describing the modern relation between Korea and Japan and the past war of invasion, it reduced and concealed the violent fact and interpreted the history in narrow-minded and native land-oriented viewpoint. Moreover, the Husosha textbook lowered the rate of selection of the textbook that described Japanese blame and responsibility for the invasion war and war crimes.
Analysis of the relationship between Korea and Japan in modern times described in the history textbooks of Korea showed in general the nation and state-oriented description of history The Korean history textbook abused the word 'nation', with its concept not yet defined, and beautified excessively the native people who resisted against Japanese invasion and exploitation. On the other hand, in the section of national campaign, there is hardly no mention about socialists' national campaign, but bourgeois national campaign-oriented. This shows the limitation of the description that aims at bourgeois nationalism. This is a problem related with the government authorization system of Korean history textbook.
On the contrary, the 'History Opening the Future' textbook that gives a historical message of peace and coexistence through the realistic description of the miserable history in the standpoint of reflection and reconciliation presents a direction of history education movement for formulating the Eastern Asia Community. Therefore like the publication of textbook, the 'History Opening the Future', a civil solidarity based on the shared mutual understanding and historical recognition in the private level can be enlarged to the political and economical sphere. Furthermore, it is necessary in state level to formulate an international order that enables coexistence beyond the pursuit of native land-oriented profit and the national boundary. It will become a right path enabling the formulation of future-oriented and abundant Eastern Asia Community.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 일본 중학교 역사교과서의 근대 한ㆍ일 관계 서술의 변화
Ⅲ. 한국 중학교 국사교과서의 근대 한ㆍ일 관계 서술
Ⅳ. 동아시아 공동체 형성을 위한ㆍ역사교육운동의 필요성과 방향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
역사교과서 문제의 교재화와 학습자의 인식
역사와 세계
2009 .06
-
일본 중학교 역사교과서의 중ㆍ근세사 서술과 역사인식 : 후소샤(扶桑社) 교과서를 중심으로
한국사연구
2005 .06
-
교수요목기 중등 역사 검정 교과서의 발행 상황과 목록화
역사교육
2019 .09
-
제 7차 교육과정 高等學校 國史敎科書의 내용 분석
역사교육
2002 .12
-
Problems in the Writing of Korean History Textbooks
Korea Journal
1998 .03
-
한국교과서의 문제와 전망 : 근현대사를 중심으로
한국사연구
2002 .03
-
동북아 시대에서 한국사 서술과 역사교육 : ‘국사’를 넘어서
역사교육
2005 .09
-
한국사 교과서 검정 파동의 원인과 과제
역사와현실
2014 .06
-
일본 역사교과서 문제와 그 전망
한국사연구
2002 .03
-
해방후 현대사 교육 내용 기준의 변천과 국사교과서 서술
역사학보
2010 .03
-
『세계사』교과서 일본사 관련 서술의 현황과 전망 : 전근대사 서술을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2017 .12
-
제1차 교육과정기 발행 『중등국사』 (역사교육연구회 엮음) 교과서의 특성과 의의
역사교육
2018 .06
-
역사전쟁을 성찰하며 - 정사(正史) · 정통성(正統性)론의 함정
역사비평
2019 .08
-
세계사 교과서 속의 미국 : 제7차 교육과정 세계사 교과서를 중심으로
역사교육
2010 .06
-
국정 『국사』 교과서와 검정 『한국사』 교과서의 현대사 체계와 내용 분석
역사와현실
2014 .06
-
國史敎科書 編纂의 問題點과 改善方向
역사교육
2000 .12
-
1930년대 경성제국대학의 역사 교과서 비판과 조선총독부의 대응
동북아역사논총
2013 .12
-
중국 상하이 『역사』교과서 논쟁과 지식인 : 상하이 지역 고등학교 역사교과서의 변화
중국근현대사연구
2019 .03
-
역사교육에서 고대사 영역의 내용 체계와 계열성 검토 : 2011 교육과정과 2013 검정교과서를 중심으로
역사교육
2018 .09
-
일본 중학교 역사교과서의 한국근대사 서술과 역사인식
한국사연구
2005 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-018388627