메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국알타이학회 알타이학보 알타이학보 제18호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
183 - 196 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study describes how the numerals of tens in Altaic languages are formed, and consider whether the methods used were inherent to those languages or introduced by some other factors. One of the outstanding features of numeral formation in Korean, which is shared by some other Altaic languages, is that the numerals of tens from 20 through 50, i.e., 20, 30, 40 and 50, are formed in a way which is different from that used in forming the numerals of tens from 60 through 90, i.e., 60, 70, 80 and 90. The formation of the numerals of tens shows that they are introduced into the languages by suppletion, not by derivation from their basic single-digit numerals of two through five. If it is true that those numerals of 20 through 50 are results of suppletion in languages like Turkic, Tungusic, or Korean languages, we may conclude that the methods of numeral formation in Mongolian languages (which derive all the numerals from the single-digit numbers) are the most conservative ones, because in most Indo- European, Semitic, and Sino-Tibetan languages, all the numerals of tens from 20 through 90 have forms derived from the single-digit numerals of two through nine. It would then be not unreasonable to think that the numerals from 60 through 90 in some Turkic and Tungusic languages and in Korean were not produced by the inherent system of those Altaic languages, but by loans from the relevant languages they came across in the course of ethnic contacts in some later periods.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0