메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생성문법학회 생성문법연구 생성문법연구 제25권 제2호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
473 - 499 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims at explaining (i) why negative imperatives are allowed in Korean, as opposed to many Indo-European languages such as Italian, Modern Greek and Spanish; and (ii) why only a specific type of long form negation (LFN), namely mal, is available in Korean negative imperatives. First, we argue with empirical evidence that Korean permits TP in imperatives, a necessary condition for the presence of NegP in Zanuttini's (1996) cross-linguistic generalization that licensing of NegP is contingent upon the presence of TP. The current view is distinguished from most previous research as the latter simply takes it for granted that Korean is among a group of languages allowing negative imperatives, without seriously considering the issue in the cross-linguistic context. Second, we claim that the reason only NegP headed by LFN mal can appear in Korean negative imperatives is that the NegP of this kind is selected by Jussive Phrase where not only a person feature but also a feature of [+deontic] is encoded. This idea is a reminiscent of Han and Lee (2007) in which they suggest that the deontic feature is specified in ModP in charge of deontic modality. Departing from Han and Lee, however, we do not postulate ModP, but assume Jussive Phrase advanced by Zanuttini, Pak and Portner (2012). Our analysis appealing to ‘the selectional restriction’ can be supported by the fact that LFN mal is not possible in the lower clause of key-ha 'let' imperatives in Korean, and can be extended to their kin clause types such as exhortatives (cf. Pak et al. (2004)).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0