지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper explores an intersection of two central issues of Generative Grammar, ellipsis and anaphora. Specifically, I focus on fragments of self-pronouns, i.e. short responses constituted by single self-pronouns, and argue that they give a piece of evidence for the direct-generation analysis of fragments, in which fragments are not derived from underlying full sentences but directly generated as what they are. I demonstrate that self-pronouns are much less restricted in fragments than in sentences, showing cases of fragments of self-pronouns whose sentential counterparts are ungrammatical for violation of Binding Condition A. Then, Binding Theory as well as the deletion analysis of fragments are challenged. The fact indicates that self-pronouns are all logophors or logophoric anaphoras when they are fragments. This is predicted by Reinhart and Reuland’s (1993) generalization that self-pronouns are anaphors only when they are arguments of syntactic predicates. The requirement is not fulfilled in fragments, if they have no covert sentential structures.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (46)
참고문헌 신청
Barton, E. / 1990 / Nonsentential constituents: A theory of grammatical structure and pragmatic interpretation / John Benjamins
Barton, E / 1998 / The grammar of telegraphic structures: Sentential and nonsentential derivation / Journal of English Linguistics 26:30~37
Chomsky, N. / 1965 / Aspects of the theory of syntax / MIT Press
Chomsky, N. / 1972 / Studies on semantics in generative grammar / Mouton
Chomsky, N. / 1981 / Lectures on government and binding / Foris
Barton, E / 1998 / The grammar of telegraphic structures: Sentential and nonsentential derivation / Journal of English Linguistics 26:30~37
Chomsky, N. / 1965 / Aspects of the theory of syntax / MIT Press
Chomsky, N. / 1972 / Studies on semantics in generative grammar / Mouton
Chomsky, N. / 1981 / Lectures on government and binding / Foris
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean
언어연구
2017 .01
-
관용표현이 조각문에 관해 말해주는 것
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
국어 조각구에 관한 분석
언어학 연구
2016 .04
-
독일어 인칭대명사의 사용방식
언어와언어학
2016 .01
-
《伍倫全備諺解》의 인칭 대명사 연구
중국문학
2024 .08
-
Asymmetry of Deletion within the Pied-Piping Fragment
언어와 정보
2019 .02
-
Pronominal Anaphora Resolution in Korean: Investigating the Effects of Case-marking
언어
2023 .06
-
On Caseless Fragments and Some Implications
어학연구
2017 .08
-
Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Negated Fragments: A Direct Interpretation Approach
영어학
2020 .03
-
한국어 조각문의 형성 과정: (이동과) 생략
언어와 정보사회
2017 .07
-
A Plea for Null Arguments
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
Online Resolution of Subject Pronouns in Korean
담화와인지
2022 .02
-
Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Interpretation and Processing of Null and Overt Pronouns in Korean
담화와인지
2021 .02
-
Case and Postposition Stranding in Multiple Fragments : Why is the Final Fragment (not) Special?
어학연구
2015 .12
-
Remarks on Topic and Binding in Fragments
언어과학연구
2016 .12
-
학습자 언어분석 –구어체에서 일인칭대명사의 경우를 예로–
일본연구
2015 .01
-
Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)
생성문법연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0