메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
어문연구학회 어문연구 어문연구 제55권
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
51 - 72 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper studies two problems. One is to discriminate the CP(Complex Predicates) from Base-separation of word, the other is to investigate whether [V-어 AV(auxiliary verbs)], [V-어 V] is the CP. And the concept of CP which is adopted in this paper is based on Lee Ho-Seung(2003). 1. [X+Hada] is split into two classes. [X+hada] as the CP have all or more than one of the following syntactic phenomena:① X can be modify by the modifiers,② X can become head of the relative clause, ③ the general adverbials can be located between X and Hada, ④ the one more Xs can be connected. The other hand, [X+hada] as word has not one of this syntactic phenomena. 2. [V-어 AV] is essentially syntactic construction. Auxiliary verb often constructions function as if it is morphological unit. But This appearance is not because syntactic [V-어 AV] is restructured as the morphological form, but because AV is syntactic-semantically dependant on V. Auxiliary verb construction is not the CP in that [V-어 AV] can't have argument structure. 3. Some [V-어 V]s is regarded as serial verb constructions(SVC). This theory considers SVC as the independent constructions which is not coordinate sentences and not compound verbs. But syntactic phenomena of the so-called SVC prove that this constructions is not SVC but coordinate sentences. Also morphological characteristics of this constructions make us admit the compound verbs which is the same forms as the so-called SVC. Finally I argue that SVC doesn't exist and it is unnecessary that ask whether SVC is the CP.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0