지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine the distributional patterns of relative pronouns and identify the pragmatic factors that affect the choice of a particular type of relative pronoun in discourse. To find out the pragmatic factors that characterize the use of relative pronouns, we examined overall types of relative pronouns employed in discourse on a corpus-based analysis, and investigated the combinational patterns of relative clauses in written and spoken discourse. The findings from the data analysis showed that relative pronouns, as an ‘accessibility marker’, can be a parameter in combining with a particular type of relative clause in discourse as follows: 1) ‘salience’ function: zero < that < which < who < whom; 2) ‘unification’ function: zero > that > which or who > whom. Consequently, we claim that the choice of an antecedent-relative pronoun combination is determined by the pragmatic factors such as ‘salience’ and ‘unification’, which contribute to the facilitation of language processing and production.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
Ariel, M. / 2001 / Text representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects / John Benjamins
Diaz Perez, F. J. / 1997 / Relative Connectives in Present-Day English: A Corpus-Based Analysis / Miscelane: A Journal of English and American Studies 18
Fox, B. A. / 1990 / A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses / Language 66 (2) : 297 ~ 316
Fox, B. A. / 2007 / Relative Clauses in English conversation : Relativizers, frequency and the notion of construction / Studies in Language 31 (2) : 293 ~ 326
Givon, T. / 1992 / The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions / Linguistics 30 : 5 ~ 55
Diaz Perez, F. J. / 1997 / Relative Connectives in Present-Day English: A Corpus-Based Analysis / Miscelane: A Journal of English and American Studies 18
Fox, B. A. / 1990 / A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses / Language 66 (2) : 297 ~ 316
Fox, B. A. / 2007 / Relative Clauses in English conversation : Relativizers, frequency and the notion of construction / Studies in Language 31 (2) : 293 ~ 326
Givon, T. / 1992 / The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions / Linguistics 30 : 5 ~ 55
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Corpus-based Analysis of the Variation of Relative Pronouns Depending on Genres
언어학 연구
2015 .01
-
학술적 에세이 코퍼스를 기반으로 한 한국 대학생과 영어 원어민 대학생의 관계대명사의 사용 비교
Studies in English Education
2018 .01
-
독일어 인칭대명사의 사용방식
언어와언어학
2016 .01
-
《伍倫全備諺解》의 인칭 대명사 연구
중국문학
2024 .08
-
Pronominal Anaphora Resolution in Korean: Investigating the Effects of Case-marking
언어
2023 .06
-
Interpretation and Processing of Null and Overt Pronouns in Korean
담화와인지
2021 .02
-
Relative Clauses and Labeling Algorithm
새한영어영문학
2016 .08
-
Online Resolution of Subject Pronouns in Korean
담화와인지
2022 .02
-
A Plea for Null Arguments
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
An expectation-based account for the processing difficulty of it object-extracted relative clauses
언어
2019 .12
-
Expressing Others by Second-Person Markers in Korean
담화와인지
2020 .11
-
학습자 언어분석 –구어체에서 일인칭대명사의 경우를 예로–
일본연구
2015 .01
-
A Study of the Derivation of Relative Clauses: Focusing on Case-Assignment and Co-indexing
영어영문학연구
2020 .01
-
2인칭대명사의 변천과 사회문화적 요인
일어일문학연구
2016 .11
-
On gapless relatives in spoken English
언어와언어학
2024 .02
-
Effects of NP Type on L2 Processing of Relative Clauses
언어와언어학
2020 .01
-
어절 ‘나’의 중의성 해소를 위한 통계학적 연구 - 구어 말뭉치에 나타난 대명사 ‘나’를 중심으로 -
한말연구
2024 .09
-
A Descriptive and Statistical Analysis of Relative Clauses in Beowulf
영어학연구
2016 .12
-
L2 Processing of English Pronouns and Reflexives : Evidence from Eye-movements
영어학
2016 .12
-
Indefinite Relative Pronoun Whatever : A Corpus-based Approach from OE to EME
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2015 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0