메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제20권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
183 - 222 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently, Korean companies are threatened from patent infringement law suits in the US courts by patent trolls and other patent holders. Thus, Korean parties interesting defending in such law suits made a union to protect their interests by allying other interesting parties. In that consequence, information including patent strategies would be communicated with each other. Later, however, the communication can be disclosed by using a subpoena or through other discovery devices. In the civil procedure in the US courts, each party can request documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the production of evidence by requesting, such as, productions of documents and depositions. Korea has two attorney systems for patent process at the KIPO and a patent court. The patent attorneys can represent their client both KIPO and the court. Byunrisa, similar to patent agent of the U.S., represents his client at the KIPO process and limited cases in the court which is subsequent process after issuance of a patent application. The attorney-client privilege applies to the communication between attorney and his client. It also applies to the communication between patent agent and his client after Sperry. However, it is unclear to apply the privilege to the communication between the foreign patent agent and his client. However, rationales of recent cases would suggest the privilege would apply the communication between the foreign patent including Korean patent agent, Byunrisa, agent and his client.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0