메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국환경보건학회 한국환경보건학회지 한국환경보건학회지 제31권 제5호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
431 - 443 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study was performed to investigate the perceptions of the opinion leaders, such as government officials, researchers,NGO workers, and journalists on the risks of endocrine disrupters (EDs) and genetically modified organisms(GMOs) as well as the related policies on these two hazards or potential hazards. The opinion leaders generally consideredthe EDs as the most serious hazard among twenty-one environmental health hazards in Korea, and agreed thatthe EDs would continuously be the most serious hazard. On overall average, the GMOs were ranked the 11th amongthe twenty-one health hazards. Further investigation indicated that the GMOs were variously ranked by the group ofrespondents: they were ranked the 2nd by the NGO workers, the 7th by the journalists, the 9th by the researchers andthe 11th by the government officials. In general, the respondents considered the dioxin as a hazard with the highest riskwhile the GMOs were considered less hazardous. The opinion leaders considered that although the risks of the GMOsand EDs were not fully verified, the risks should be controlled through the legislation. The EDs and GMOs should beseparately regulated for the time being, while the EDs should put under more strengthened regulation. It is recommendedthat a web-site containing the information on the EDs and the GMOs be prepared for the journalists. In addition,a training program in relation to the EDs and the GMOs needs to be organized by the Korean Press Foundationand the Korea Food and Drug Administration to educate the journalists. A committee consisting of government officials,scientists, and NGO workers needs to be established, and it should provide framework of future policies and public relationsprograms.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0