메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

How is it possible to introduce the board-level employee representation in Korea? - Centering around the public enterprises in Seoul Metropoltitan City
Recommendations
Search
Questions

한국에서' 근로자이사제'의 도입은 어떻게 가능한가 - 서울시 투자 · 출연기관의 시도를 중심으로

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Park, Tae-ju (고려대학교)
Journal
Society of Labor Low Theory and Profession Labor Law Forum No.19 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2016.11
Pages
39 - 71 (33page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
How is it possible to introduce the board-level employee representation in Korea? - Centering around the public enterprises in Seoul Metropoltitan City
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
In September 9<SUP>th</SUP>, 2016, the Seoul Metropolitan City Council passed “The Municipal Ordinance for the Operation of Board-level Employee Representative in the Public Enterprises of Seoul City”. Therefore for the first time nationwide, the legal basis for the introduction of labor directors was established. According to the ordinance, Seoul public enterprises with more than 100 employees should elect 1~2 non-executive board-level employee representatives.
The introduction of board-level employee representation in Seoul constitutes the main contents of economic democratization by allowing participation from the bottom. Industrial peace as well as the enhancement of efficiency can be expected from the system.
However, the trial of Seoul Metropolitan City to adopt the board-level employee representation system shows its limits in the respect that the system lacks the legal basis in terms of nationwide law. The fact that elected labor directors must quit the trade union or the fact that elected candidates from employees can sometimes not be elected as board-level representatives are also examples of the system’s decisive limitations. In addition, the management participation can be overlapped works of trade unions, in particular collective bargaining at enterprise level. Lastly it is also a limit that the discussion about works council was insufficient, which is a main axis of co-determination system as well as the board-level director system.
Whether the introduction of labor-director system in Seoul becomes a success will be the touchstone which determines the improvement of management participation of employees, and furthermore the codetermination system in Korea.

Contents

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 왜 참여형 노사관계인가
Ⅲ. 근로자이사제의 추진경과와 장애요인들
Ⅳ. 근로자이사제의 설계를 둘러싼 쟁점들
Ⅴ. 서울시 근로자이사제 도입의 한계와 과제
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

References (0)

Add References

Related precedents (1)

1 / 1
  • 대법원 2002. 2. 26. 선고 99도5380 판결

    [1] 정리해고나 사업조직의 통폐합 등 기업의 구조조정의 실시 여부는 경영주체에 의한 고도의 경영상 결단에 속하는 사항으로서 이는 원칙적으로 단체교섭의 대상이 될 수 없고, 그것이 긴박한 경영상의 필요나 합리적인 이유 없이 불순한 의도로 추진되는 등의 특별한 사정이 없는 한, 노동조합이 실질적으로 그 실시 자체를 반대하기 위하여 쟁의행위

    View more

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-360-001214782