메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제15권 제2호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
161 - 173 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper intends to study the international standard banking practice of letter of credit between Korea and China. Generally speaking, there are no major differences in both countries. But there are minor differences in both countries due to the difference of law and practices, legal system and banking practices of Korea and China. First, there are some differences in the international standard banking practice of letter of credit in China due to the difference of practices under Bills of Exchange Act and the Provisions of the Supreme Peoples’s Court on Some Issues Concerning the Trial Cases of Disputes over Letter of Credit. The Act insists on the consistency between the amount written in words and a figure amount. The Provisions include the recognition of revocable credits, the difference of standard in examining documents. Second, there are some differences in the legal systems and compliance with international standard in both countries. Judges in China tend to abuse the injunctions owing to the lack of understanding in relation to letters of credit. On the other hand, Korean judges rarely allow an injunction in cases of asserted fraud. Third, there are some differences in the standard banking practices of letter of credit in both countries. Korean nominated banks act positively, but Chinese nominated banks act passively. There are more soft clauses in the letters of credit of China than in Korea.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0