메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
하현수 (전북대학교)
저널정보
한국관세학회 관세학회지 關稅學會誌 第9卷 第1號
발행연도
2008.2
수록면
291 - 314 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, I found out the attitude of fraud of letter of credit(L/C) in Chinese court through analyzing the judicial interpretation related to fraud of L/C in Supreme People's Court(SPC) in China. Moreover, I would like to give some helps to understand more deeply about the provision related to fraud of L/C in China through more thoroughly analyzing the standard of fraud, the limit of application of fraud exception, the responsibility immune and so forth in the judicial interpretation in China. There are some problems and implications related to the judicial interpretation in fraud of L/C in China observed in this paper as follow. First of all, the judicial interpretation in fraud of L/C in China is nothing more than a leading suggestion of SPC. Therefore, there are some problems that the judicial interpretation cannot be applied strictly and also has low efficiency in law. Secondly, Chinese judges have lack of understanding about L/C. The lack of knowledge in L/C of judges led to overissue the ruling of stopping of payment. Especially, the situations of overissuing the order of suspension are found out in judgement of district court which doesn't have opportunities to handle the fraud of Lie. Thirdly, the types of fraud of L/C in 'conflict provision about L/C, 2006' are provided too general and also too abstractive. Thus, the article 8(4) in the provision provided that 'in case of processing the situations of other frauds of L/C' can be authorized as fraud of L/C. Even though the provision also provides for dealing with fraud types except for the fraud types which are provided in the article 8 because of complex and diversity in fraud of L/C, the provision can be easily used by the parties who don't want to pay the amount of L/C or want to delay. Furthermore, because courts can apply different standards in the same provision, predictability, which is the basis of law, can be depreciated a lot. Fourthly, the situation that China formulated the specific provision related to fraud of L/C is worth to pay attention comparing to the situation that most of countries in the world are not only formulating the special provision about fraud of L/C but also applying general law related to fraud.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중국 국내법상 사기관련 규정에 대한 일반적 고찰
Ⅲ. 중국의 신용장 사기관련 사법해석
Ⅳ. 시사점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002833118