메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국해사법학회 해사법연구 해사법연구 제31권 제1호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
161 - 180 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Under the current international legal frameworks with respect to ship-recycling industry, relevant authorities are struggling from pursuing shipowners’ illegal trade of an end-of-life vessel to the shipbreaking yards, although it can be considered as a material fact to environmental harms caused by activities of ship-recycling. In this line, this paper will explore issues of circumvention by shipowners in relation to responsibility under the current international legal frameworks such as the Basel Convention and Hong Kong Convention. Based on examination of those conventions, this paper would find lack of effective control measures over shipowner’s transactions of end-of-life vessels to ship-breaking yards in South Asia through intermediaries under current international environmental law. Thus, to ensure responsibility of shipowners in relation to environmental harms in South Asian ship-breaking beaching yards, this paper examine principles of international environmental law including the polluter pays principle, and transboundary harm and liability principle. That is because environmental costs may be internalised by imposing liability on shipowners as the polluter in ship-recycling industry and also transboundary harm and its liability to a State may call concerned States more to be aware of shipowners’ activities of scrapping vessels.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0