메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
21세기영어영문학회 영어영문학21 영어영문학21 제32권 제2호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
349 - 372 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to explore creativity assessment in the context of English dramas. The current study has three research questions. How many points do students give to the area of creativity in their rubrics? How do they construct their definitions of creativity? Does creativity assessment yield acceptable inter-rater reliability? For the study, fifty university students wrote English drama, designed scoring rubrics for assessing the dramas, and conducted a self-assessment using their rubrics. The researchers analyzed the learner-generated rubrics and learners’ verbal reports about the construct of creativity and, further, compared students’ self-assessment scores to those of experts’. The finding indicates that 60% of the students included creativity in their rubrics, and that they considered language use and creativity as the most important and the second most important category. Students viewed creativity as defined by novelty, appropriateness, and interest and explained creativity mainly in conjunction with content. Finally, although the interrater difference between student raters and experts was comparatively notable in the area of creativity, the value of interrater reliability was in the acceptable range. The implication of this study is that learners’ participation in rubric development is a meaningful pathway to enlighten creativity in assessment practices.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0