메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤경진 (경상대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2019년 겨울호(통권 제129호)
발행연도
2019.11
수록면
225 - 263 (41page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2019.11.129.225

이용수

DBpia Top 0.5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Examined in this article are several important debate points raised in the recent discussion of the issue concerning Shilla’s [supposed] unification of the three ancient kingdoms, namely Goguryeo, Paekje and Shilla. What kind of approaches and directions such discussion should take in the future is also discussed here as well.
The argument that Shilla ‘unified’ the three states has been based upon the fact that not only parts of the old Goguryeo territory was included in the ‘Unified Shilla’ realm, but also the three states respectively held on to the notion that the three kingdoms actually shared the same root in origin, and from very early on wanted to eventually ‘integrate’ them, with either one of them as the final victor. Unfortunately, this argument seems to be lacking any foundation based on verifiable facts.
After the war of the 7th century, disposition of territories were decided by ‘To whom it originally belonged.’ Shilla was only authorized to claim jurisdiction over the late Baekje territory, and it was up to right beneath the Daedong river line. Also, at the time wars meant a defensive action, subduing and repelling enemy forces invading one’s territory, while the notion of “Three Hans being one” notion only appeared in the 9th century.
In response to this new observation, the main trend studies have delivered their own critical take and rebuttal. But such rebuttal was rather a repeat of existing arguments, and crucial points are yet to be appropriately addressed. In this article, the rebuttals are again critically reevaluated one by one, while future prospects for the discussion itself is also mentioned.

목차

1. 머리말: 신라 ‘삼국통일’ 논쟁의 현 주소
2. 7세기 신라의 영토의식
3. 삼한과 삼한일통의식
4. 맺음말: 앞으로의 논의 방향
참고문헌

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-905-000080122