지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Generics have been studied vigorously over the past few decades, mostly by formal linguists and philosophers. As is well known, there are two representative formal approaches toward generics: majority-based and normalcy-based approaches. Both approaches have been met with criticism but continue to undergo revisions. In contrast, Leslie (2007a,2007b; 2008; 2012; 2017) proposes a cognition-based approach arguing against the majority- and normalcy-based approaches. She proposes that generics express our most primitive and fundamental generalizations and are non-quantificational. Thus, the main purpose of this paper is to propose genericity as a semantic, pragmatic, and even cognitive phenomenon, arguing that generics should be accounted for through cognitive conceptualizations. It will also be proposed that the generic operator is a quasi-universal quantifier, in contrast to both the formal and cognitive approaches. This position will be supported by experimental results.
목차
ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Previous Approaches
3. A New Analysis
4. Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
Asher, N. / 1995 / The generic book / Chicago University Press :300~339
Claveau, F. / 2018 / Generic generalizations in science: A bridge to everyday language / Erkenntnis :1~21
Cohen, A. / 1996 / Think generic: The meaning and use of generic sentences
Cohen, A. / 1999 / Generics, frequency adverbs, and probability / Linguistics and Philosophy 22(3):221~253
Cohen, A. / 2004 / Generics and mental representation / Linguistics and Philosophy 27(5):529~555
Claveau, F. / 2018 / Generic generalizations in science: A bridge to everyday language / Erkenntnis :1~21
Cohen, A. / 1996 / Think generic: The meaning and use of generic sentences
Cohen, A. / 1999 / Generics, frequency adverbs, and probability / Linguistics and Philosophy 22(3):221~253
Cohen, A. / 2004 / Generics and mental representation / Linguistics and Philosophy 27(5):529~555
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Perceptions on Generic Exceptions
영어학
2021 .01
-
Two Different Mechanisms for Generics
영어영문학
2020 .05
-
Non-conventionalized Generics and Exceptions
영어학
2023 .01
-
In the Middle of Korean Middles
언어학 연구
2022 .10
-
The Syntactic Representation of Genericity and the Unnecessity of the Stage- and Individual-level Predicate Distinction
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
한국인 영어 학습자의 총칭 정관사와 유일 정관사 습득 양상
언어와 정보사회
2019 .01
-
現代漢語“有VP”的三個特殊句式
중국어문학지
2022 .03
-
19세기 중국 대표자역본(Delegates’ version) 과정의 신명(神名) 논쟁 재고찰
신학사상
2022 .06
-
The Necessity of Minimal Representation of Genericity in a Newly Developed Language, Unish
Journal of Universal Language
2021 .09
-
An Investigation of the Generic Structure and Lexico-Grammatical Features of the Discussion Section of Research Articles
영어영문학21
2018 .01
-
Generic Analysis of Japanese Right-Wing Politicians’ Rhetoric on the Colonization of Korea and the Wartime Atrocities
한국수사학회 학술대회
2015 .11
-
从“吃”看动词不同论元作宾语的省略情况
동아인문학
2017 .06
-
The Role of L3 in the Interpretation of Articles with Definite Plurals in L2 English
Journal of Asia TEFL
2019 .01
-
유개념에 대한 맹자의 인식과 활용
孔子學
2015 .11
-
한국어 주격 표지 ‘-이/가’와 화제의 표시
언어연구
2019 .01
-
영어 통사 구조의 인지적 구성 요소 연구
언어과학연구
2021 .03
-
영어와 한국어의 양화사 의미와 중의성 연구
영어영문학
2019 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0