메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Junsuk Park (Seymyung University)
저널정보
한국중원언어학회 언어학 연구 언어학연구 제54호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
177 - 198 (22page)
DOI
10.17002/sil..54.202001.177

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this empirical research, we delve into the long-held discussion between raising and control and discuss the pros and cons of the movement theory of control (Hornstein, 2001; Hornstein & Polinsky, 2010). Following Sportiche (1988) and Bobaljik (1998), this study illustrates that a quantifier which appears and gets stranded within the embedded infinitive clause of control construction exhibits syntactic behaviors which cannot be accounted for under Hornstein (2001)’s MTC framework. Through analysis of numerous English and Korean data, this study shows that, unlike a quantifier in raising, a quantifier stranded in the embedded clause of control construction is not always associated with the matrix subject. In many instances, a quantifier base-generated in the embedded infinitive clause of control construction is observed to be associated with some other elements which are outside the matrix CP. This phenomenon is observed uniformly both in English and Korean. From these findings, this study concludes that a quantifier’s syntactic behaviors exhibited in control construction can only be accurately and properly explained under the PRO theorem(Chomsky 1981, 1986), hence no movement.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Issues with raising and control
3. Quantifiers in raising and control
4. Subject control and object control
5. Lingering issues with the MTC
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-705-000352345