Comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign, pre-malignant, and low grade malignant pancreatic tumors

Sang Hwa Song; Hee Joon Kim; Eun Kyu Park; Young Hoe Hur; Yang Seok Koh; Chol Kyoon Cho

추천

검색

질문

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Sang Hwa Song (Chonnam National University Medical School) Hee Joon Kim (Chonnam National University Medical School) Eun Kyu Park (Chonnam National University Medical School) Young Hoe Hur (Chonnam National University Medical School) Yang Seok Koh (Chonnam National University Medical School) Chol Kyoon Cho (Chonnam National University Medical School)

저널정보: 한국간담췌외과학회 Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 한국간담췌외과학회지 제24권 제1호

발행연도: 2020.2

수록면: 57 - 62 (6page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Backgrounds/Aims: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in benign disease is is safer and more favorable to patients than open distal pancreatectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 150 patients who underwent laparoscopic (n=69) or open (=81) distal pancreatectomy at a double institutes from 2008 to 2018. We reviewed each patient’s history for age, sex, pathologic diagnosis. Specific outcomes that were included hospital stay, operative time (in minutes), operative blood loss (in milliliters), 30-daymajormorbidity and mortality (Clavian-Dindo classification), pancreatic leak rate (grade of leak A, B, or C), pancreatic hemorrhage. Results: From 2008 to 2018, there were 150 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy for benign pancreatic disease. 81 patients underwent open and 69 patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) Intra-operative estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the LDP group than in the OPD group (200 vs. 400 ml p＜0.01). There was no difference in blood transfusion between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the resection method between the two groups (p＜0.01) and there was a significant difference in the use of mesh for prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (53 vs. 34 p＜0.01). There was no significant difference in incidence of POPF (15.9% in LDP vs 7.4% in ODP, p=0.235) between the two groups, morbidity rate between the two groups (18 vs. 30 p=0.152), post - pancreatectomy hemorrhage, wound infection, hospital stay and readmission. Conclusions: LDP showed there was no difference in the occurrence of POPF, complication and hospital stay. In contrast, intra-operative blood loss was significantly lower in the LDP group than in the ODP group, and LDP was also significantly better in the view point of the feeding advance. In other words, LDP is safer and more favorable to patients than ODP.

#Distal pancreatectomy #Laparoscopy #Blood loss #Hospital stay

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!