메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김준배 (해군사관학교)
저널정보
국방부 군사편찬연구소 군사 군사 제114호
발행연도
2020.3
수록면
243 - 280 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper analyzes how Lee Sun-Sin is depicted in 『A history of naval battles in the Imjin war』, published in 1942, during the Sino-Japanese War and the Pacific War, and what kind of authors’ perceptions and backgrounds influenced these descriptions written in the book. This book was published by Arima Seiho, rear admiral, who was a war history expert already published various writings on war history.
What he portrayed in his 『A history of naval battles in the Imjin war』 were Joseon’s negative side for political system, individualistic Koreans, Lee Sun-sin, who lacked military spirit, comparing to courageous and brilliant Japanese. To make this more effective, he argues against existing theories. However, his evidence presented with it was not convincing. He argues that these detailed studies show that the impact of the naval battles on the whole phase of the war was not significant, and that the Korean navy did not block Japanese supply lines. However, this is not true that Joseon navy’s efforts have made it impossible for Japanese army to eventually wage war as intended. He also justifies that Japanese admirals struggled for achievement and merits, eventually leading to defeat in battle. In this way, he finds the cause of the failure in the Imjin War by his detailed research, weakens his argument by defending it, and repeats the lack of evidence. In conclusion, he argues that the most essential element of war is the human element, as is the case in ground battles by army and diplomacy. Through this, he fails to draw lessons from the naval battle. In the end, his book focused on just enhancing the Japanese pride, which can be understood by the influence of Japanese centralism during the Pacific War.

목차

1. 서론
2. 아리마 세이호와 『조선역 수군사』
3. 『조선역 수군사』 속의 조선·이순신 비판론
4. 해전사로서의 의의(意義) 상실
5. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
(Abstract)

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-390-000463151