메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제15권 제6호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
121 - 141 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a tractable general-equilibrium model, where the market is mixed of large firms (oligopoly) and small firms (monopolistic competition). We will provide new implication of trade gain. Design/Methodology/Approach – Our discussion relies on theoretic analysis for the interaction between large firms and small firms. Large firms compete in quantity-setting (Cournot-competition) so that strategically behave. Large firms are a first-mover while small firms are a second-mover. Findings - When the economy is open, the market-expansion effect induces large firms to reschedule to produce more, and to demand more high-quality workers. The expansion of output-schedules crowds out the production of small firms. The demand of high-quality workers widens wage inequality within country. Small firms lose from trade. However, the more productive workers of small firms gain because large firms offers them jobs. Not all large firms gain. Firms of low-quality workers would lose from trade. Research Implications or Originality - Overall, the effect of trade liberalization on welfare is ambiguous. It depends on distribution of labor qualities and number of large firms. When a country is abundant (scarce) of high-quality laborers, welfare improves (declines). When both countries have the same distribution of labor qualities, welfare improves in the country with a greater number of large firms. This paper can contribute to the literature of granular firms, labor market imperfection, and trade.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0