메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
裵銀貞 (부산외국어대학교)
저널정보
대한일어일문학회 일어일문학 日語日文學 第87輯
발행연도
2020.8
수록면
5 - 20 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, I examined the subtle difference between two sentences: the “tearu” that indicates “efficacy, “ and the perfect “teiru” which can be replace the former. In addition, I looked into the causes of the nuance. The results are summarized as follows.
[1] The “tearu” sentence of effect suggests “not only when the action is performed, but the content is properly transmitted and recognized”. In contrast, the perfect “teiru” sentence implies paying attention to the action itself from the actor.
[2] The “tearu” sentence of potency has the form of potency in which the meaning of “preparation” is more emphasized. However, in the case of the perfect “teiru” sentence, the meaning of “preparation” is weak, and therefore, often accompanied by a specific “adverb” in order to be convey the same meaning as the “tearu” sentence of effect.
[3] Among the “tearu” sentence of efficacy, if the type is close to the syntax of passive structure, it is difficult to identify the actor, and it is easy to interpret it as an objective sentence. Meanwhile, in the case of the perfect “teiru” sentence, the actor can be readily identified, and thus it is recognized as a subjective sentence as opposed to the “tearu” sentence.

목차

〈Abstract〉
1. はじめに
2. 先行研究の検討及び問題の提起
3. インフォマント調査
4. まとめ
参考文献
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-830-001124552