지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I examined the subtle difference between two sentences: the “tearu” that indicates “efficacy, “ and the perfect “teiru” which can be replace the former. In addition, I looked into the causes of the nuance. The results are summarized as follows.
[1] The “tearu” sentence of effect suggests “not only when the action is performed, but the content is properly transmitted and recognized”. In contrast, the perfect “teiru” sentence implies paying attention to the action itself from the actor.
[2] The “tearu” sentence of potency has the form of potency in which the meaning of “preparation” is more emphasized. However, in the case of the perfect “teiru” sentence, the meaning of “preparation” is weak, and therefore, often accompanied by a specific “adverb” in order to be convey the same meaning as the “tearu” sentence of effect.
[3] Among the “tearu” sentence of efficacy, if the type is close to the syntax of passive structure, it is difficult to identify the actor, and it is easy to interpret it as an objective sentence. Meanwhile, in the case of the perfect “teiru” sentence, the actor can be readily identified, and thus it is recognized as a subjective sentence as opposed to the “tearu” sentence.
[1] The “tearu” sentence of effect suggests “not only when the action is performed, but the content is properly transmitted and recognized”. In contrast, the perfect “teiru” sentence implies paying attention to the action itself from the actor.
[2] The “tearu” sentence of potency has the form of potency in which the meaning of “preparation” is more emphasized. However, in the case of the perfect “teiru” sentence, the meaning of “preparation” is weak, and therefore, often accompanied by a specific “adverb” in order to be convey the same meaning as the “tearu” sentence of effect.
[3] Among the “tearu” sentence of efficacy, if the type is close to the syntax of passive structure, it is difficult to identify the actor, and it is easy to interpret it as an objective sentence. Meanwhile, in the case of the perfect “teiru” sentence, the actor can be readily identified, and thus it is recognized as a subjective sentence as opposed to the “tearu” sentence.
목차
〈Abstract〉
1. はじめに
2. 先行研究の検討及び問題の提起
3. インフォマント調査
4. まとめ
参考文献
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
テイル·テアル構文における有生性
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2016 .09
-
連語に配慮したやさしい日本語書き換えシステムの構築
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2017 .09
-
삼척 안정사 땅설법 〈안락국태자경(安樂國太子經)〉의 연행 성격 -문자기록, 회화와의 비교를 통하여-
민속학연구
2021 .11
-
이이다(飯田)인형극제 유대와 명맥(命脈)
동아시아고대학
2020 .01
-
日本語の可能文と自発文の連続性について –条件可能文と実現可能文の分析から–
일본연구
2015 .01
-
連?修飾節における日本語「??タ」「??テイル」と 韓?語「??은?ㄴ」「??고/아?어 있는」の使用基準の違い
日本語敎育
2021 .01
-
「受身動詞＋テイル」と「自動詞＋テイル」の分布の多様性について - 状態変化動詞類を中心に-
일어일문학
2021 .11
-
중국어 명령문의 공손화법 연구
중국어문학논집
2019 .08
-
「受身＋テアル」構文について
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2017 .04
-
중도종료형 생략문의 기능 및 용법 - 접속조사 중도종료 생략문을 중심으로 -
일어일문학연구
2015 .02
-
相づちの場面間・言語間スタイル切り換え―ポライトネス的役割の観点から―
日本語敎育
2023 .03
-
‘한 단락 쓰기’ 교육을 위한 문장 쓰기 오류 분석- 한국어 모어 화자와 한국어 학습자의단락 쓰기 비교를 중심으로 -
언어와 문화
2015 .01
-
국어 소형문의 특성과 유형
언어과학연구
2017 .03
-
日本の知的障碍者向け「わかりやすい」情報提供 ー4 字以上漢字列の置き換えストラテジーを中心にー
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2023 .09
-
정보구조와 문장 배열
한국어학
2022 .05
-
모국어 표현 방식이 중국어 산출 활동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구-'對'구문을 중심으로
중국언어연구
2016 .01
-
日本語可能文の下位分類と格パターン
日本學硏究
2023 .01
-
日本語の「見え」に対する気付き
일본어학연구
2025 .03
-
小品臺词中的省略句、易位句和紧缩句考察
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
「貝の火」論 - 贈与と返礼(＝交換)の環 -
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2019 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-830-001124552