메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이동훈 (Seoul National University) 장석길 (Seoul National University) 김태형 (Seoul National University)
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第55卷 第4號(通卷 第250號)
발행연도
2020.8
수록면
95 - 116 (22page)
DOI
10.17208/jkpa.2020.08.55.4.95

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to the Restitution of Excess Rebuilding Gains Act of 2006, reconstructed apartments in the three Gangnam districts are believed to be a source of the instability in the Korean housing market. For better social equity, the act aims to retrieve the excess of the price increase accruing to the reconstruction association from the reconstruction of the apartments; thus this study attempts to quantitatively present the excessive price increase for the apartments relative to non-reconstructed apartments. Specifically, it employs a difference-in-difference model to compare the price increase between the reconstructed and non-reconstructed apartments using 10-year data of the market housing values for all 420 apartments in the three districts in which repeated sales pairs are present. The model finds that the excessive increase is insignificant in the districts of Gangnam and Songpa, whereas in Seocho, it is around 10%. Then, as the findings are incon\-sistent across the districts, this study conducts a further analysis with regard to the basic assumption of difference- in-dif\-ference analysis such that between the compared subjects, characteristics other than the reconstruction should be simi\-lar. For the analysis, it excludes 11 legal dongs, including Yangjae and Woomyeon, in which reconstructed apartments are not located; instead, the sample consists of the other 20 dongs that have both reconstructed and non-reconstructed apart\-ments. The analysis presents no differing results for Songpa and Gangnam while for Seocho, the excessive increase turns out to be unidentifiable. The finding of no excessive increase for apartments in all the three Gangnam districts implies that the reconstruction contribution levy possibly distorts social equity. Thus, this study recommends a way of improving the restitution system to mitigate the inequity of the reconstruction contribution levy, which is imposed only on the reconstruction association.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰 및 선행연구 검토
Ⅲ. 분석의 틀
Ⅳ. 분석결과
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌 References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-539-001140672