지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.9
- 수록면
- 119 - 124 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: This study was performed to compare glenoid version and inclination measured using two-dimensional (2D) images from computed tomography (CT) scans or three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed bone models.
Methods: Thirty patients who had undergone conventional CT scans were included. Two orthopedic surgeons measured glenoid version and inclination three times on 2D images from CT scans (2D measurement), and two other orthopedic surgeons performed the same measurements using 3D reconstructed bone models (3D measurement). The 3D-reconstructed bone models were acquired and measured with Mimics and 3-Matics (Materialise).
Results: Mean glenoid version and inclination in 2D measurements were –1.705° and 9.08°, respectively, while those in 3D measurements were 2.635° and 7.23°. The intra-observer reliability in 2D measurements was 0.605 and 0.698, respectively, while that in 3D measurements was 0.883 and 0.892. The inter-observer reliability in 2D measurements was 0.456 and 0.374, respectively, while that in 3D measurements was 0.853 and 0.845.
Conclusions: The difference between 2D and 3D measurements is not due to differences in image data but to the use of different tools. However, more consistent results were obtained in 3D measurement. Therefore, 3D measurement can be a good alternative for measuring glenoid version and inclination.
Methods: Thirty patients who had undergone conventional CT scans were included. Two orthopedic surgeons measured glenoid version and inclination three times on 2D images from CT scans (2D measurement), and two other orthopedic surgeons performed the same measurements using 3D reconstructed bone models (3D measurement). The 3D-reconstructed bone models were acquired and measured with Mimics and 3-Matics (Materialise).
Results: Mean glenoid version and inclination in 2D measurements were –1.705° and 9.08°, respectively, while those in 3D measurements were 2.635° and 7.23°. The intra-observer reliability in 2D measurements was 0.605 and 0.698, respectively, while that in 3D measurements was 0.883 and 0.892. The inter-observer reliability in 2D measurements was 0.456 and 0.374, respectively, while that in 3D measurements was 0.853 and 0.845.
Conclusions: The difference between 2D and 3D measurements is not due to differences in image data but to the use of different tools. However, more consistent results were obtained in 3D measurement. Therefore, 3D measurement can be a good alternative for measuring glenoid version and inclination.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
Walch G / 2013 / Three-dimensional assessment of the dimensions of the osteoarthritic glenoid / Bone Joint J 95:1377~1382
Boileau P / 2018 / Automated Three-dimensional measurement of glenoid version and inclination in arthritic shoulders / J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:57~65
Farron A / 2006 / Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:521~526
Budge MD / 2011 / Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:577~583
Friedman RJ / 1992 / The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version / J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1032~1037
Boileau P / 2018 / Automated Three-dimensional measurement of glenoid version and inclination in arthritic shoulders / J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:57~65
Farron A / 2006 / Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:521~526
Budge MD / 2011 / Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:577~583
Friedman RJ / 1992 / The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version / J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1032~1037
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Another Glenoid Measurements for Shoulder Surgery
대한견주관절의학회지
2018 .12
-
Another Glenoid Measurements for Shoulder Surgery
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
Difference in glenoid retroversion between two-dimensional axial computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed images
대한견주관절의학회지
2020 .06
-
Clinical and Radiologic results of Glenoid Bone Grafting for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with Glenoid Bony Defect at Midterm Follow-up
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .03
-
New method to measure glenoid inclination on plain X-ray of the shoulder
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
Surgical management of biconcave glenoids: a scoping review
대한견주관절의학회지
2024 .09
-
Use of custom glenoid components for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
대한견주관절의학회지
2023 .12
-
Glenoid osteotomy for atraumatic posteroinferior shoulder instability associated with glenoid dysplasia
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .03
-
The radiological change of scapula & humerus bone from retear in patients with repaired rotator cuff tear : with comparison between pre and post operation shoulder 3D CT
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .03
-
Medical measurement and its reliability
한국실험동물학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2018 .07
-
Mixed reality visualization in shoulder arthroplasty: is it better than traditional preoperative planning software?
대한견주관절의학회지
2023 .06
-
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty without Bone-Grafting for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss in Patients with Osteoarthritis and Intact Rotator Cuff: Concise Follow Up at Minimum of Five Years, of Previous Report
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .03
-
The Effects of the Anion Clothes on Human Body Change in Young Adults
신경치료
2018 .01
-
Concept of humeral/glenoid lateralization
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .11
-
Comparative Study between Glenoid versus Humerus Lateralization design in the Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty : Which lateralization design is better?
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .03
-
Three-dimensional measurement and parameters of the glenohumeral joint in a normal cadaver: guidance in the treatment of shoulder instability
Medical Biological Science and Engineering
2018 .01
-
Extension of a Scapular Fracture into the Glenoid Cavity after Low-voltage Electric Shock
대한응급의학회지
2017 .01
-
Evaluation of accuracy for 3-D printed patient-specific instrument glenoid guidance in shoulder arthroplasty
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
Relationship of Intraoperative Anatomical Landmarks, the Scapular Plane and the Perpendicular Plane with Glenoid for Central Guide Insertion during Shoulder Arthroplasty
대한견주관절의학회지
2018 .09
-
Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in linear measurements on axial images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography
Imaging science in dentistry
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-514-001168444