메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
구희영 (서울대학교) 조욱연 (국민대학교)
저널정보
한국사회체육학회 한국사회체육학회지 한국사회체육학회지 제83호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
185 - 204 (20page)
DOI
10.51979/KSSLS.2021.01.83.185

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to find out the public options for sport syndrome in general, parents who are affected by sport syndrome and how they raise their children as a sport specialist.
Method: This study used a case study which is one of the qualitative research methods based on social constructionism, and it was executed from Nov. 2018 to Oct. 21, 2019. The total number of participants was 10. Depth interviews were executed per each of them. The main meaning was extracted from each meaning of these interviews, and each meaning was categorized by difference or similarity to the main meaning according to Stake’s analysis method (1995).
Result: First, parents who are raising athletic children, their opinions for sport syndrome was mainly divided into a positive one and a negative one. In detail, positive opinions were encouraging, supporting the development of certain sports and contributing to public understanding of sports. Other hands, negative opinions were it can give fantasy that they can be a star soon, copying sport stars’ behaviors without consideration and a big gap between sports world shown by the media & real sports world. Second, sport syndrome affected several aspects of sports parenting. It affected to choose certain sports and coaches (teachers) at an early stage. Sports syndrome also appeared to have effects on dynamization stages (when parents support in various aspects for sports) and crisis stages.
Conclusion: Parents who are raising athletic children have positive and negative opinions for sport syndrome. Also, sport syndrome affects the beginning step & processing step of sport parenting.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-692-001474640