지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.6
- 수록면
- 112 - 120 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose :
The purpose of this study is evaluating usefulness Bi-presso comparing with conventional sandbag in clinical practice
Material and methods :
The pressure measuring system used in this study was Mark-10"s M5i indicator and MR04 Force sensor (Mark-10, NY, USA). In order to compare the compression force, 0.8 Kg and 1.5 Kg self-made sandbags, Hand pressuring method and Bi-presso (KM, Korea) were measured for compression force. To analyze and compare the measuring data, SPSS Version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 21. Chicago, USA) was used. A questionnaire survey was conducted for 32 patients (15 males and 17 females) applying Bi-presso after Central vein catheterization. In addition, we tried to find out the usefulness of clinical use through questionnaire survey by medical staff.
Results :
■Force compression
The result of the average of compression force 0.8 Kg sand bag: 0.11±0.02 KgF, 1.5 Kg sand bag: 0.038±0.01 KgF, human hand: 0.17±0.02 KgF, in a state of discomfort 0.42±0.05 KgF With Bi-presso applied, it is 0.19±0.02 KgF in a comfortable state and 0.42±0.01 KgF in a state of discomfort. (p <.05)
■Survey of patient group
“Are all 32 patients surveyed with tight arms or discomfort?”, “Are you feeling sore or too much pressure on the questions and pressures in the questionnaire?”, “Do you have any other discomfort when sitting or lying down?”. They said that there was no discomfort in all of the questions.
■Survey of medical staff
Sandbag: 2.36±0.89, Bi-presso: 4.1±0.80. The satisfaction score of Bi-presso was 73.72% higher than that of sandbag. The score on whether the correct position compression is performed is sandbag: 2.4±0.94, Bi-Presso: 3.95±0.88. The score for psychological stability is sandbag: 2.05±0.94, Bi--presso: 4.25±0.85 Posture during hemostasis. The score for changeability is sandbag: 2.15±0.87, Bi-presso: 4.35±0.67 When applied to hypoconscious patients, the score for compression maintenance is sandbag: 1.85±0.93, Bi-presso: 4.1±1.1 infection. The score for risk reduction was significantly higher in the sandbag: 1.75±091, Bi-Presso: 4.55±0.60 in all questionnaire items. (p <.05)
Conclusion :
In conclusion, Bi-presso is considered to be a safe and effective alternative hemostatic device that provides high satisfaction to patients and medical staff because it is possible to press the hemostasis site without risk of infection and bed stability compared to sandbags.
The purpose of this study is evaluating usefulness Bi-presso comparing with conventional sandbag in clinical practice
Material and methods :
The pressure measuring system used in this study was Mark-10"s M5i indicator and MR04 Force sensor (Mark-10, NY, USA). In order to compare the compression force, 0.8 Kg and 1.5 Kg self-made sandbags, Hand pressuring method and Bi-presso (KM, Korea) were measured for compression force. To analyze and compare the measuring data, SPSS Version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 21. Chicago, USA) was used. A questionnaire survey was conducted for 32 patients (15 males and 17 females) applying Bi-presso after Central vein catheterization. In addition, we tried to find out the usefulness of clinical use through questionnaire survey by medical staff.
Results :
■Force compression
The result of the average of compression force 0.8 Kg sand bag: 0.11±0.02 KgF, 1.5 Kg sand bag: 0.038±0.01 KgF, human hand: 0.17±0.02 KgF, in a state of discomfort 0.42±0.05 KgF With Bi-presso applied, it is 0.19±0.02 KgF in a comfortable state and 0.42±0.01 KgF in a state of discomfort. (p <.05)
■Survey of patient group
“Are all 32 patients surveyed with tight arms or discomfort?”, “Are you feeling sore or too much pressure on the questions and pressures in the questionnaire?”, “Do you have any other discomfort when sitting or lying down?”. They said that there was no discomfort in all of the questions.
■Survey of medical staff
Sandbag: 2.36±0.89, Bi-presso: 4.1±0.80. The satisfaction score of Bi-presso was 73.72% higher than that of sandbag. The score on whether the correct position compression is performed is sandbag: 2.4±0.94, Bi-Presso: 3.95±0.88. The score for psychological stability is sandbag: 2.05±0.94, Bi--presso: 4.25±0.85 Posture during hemostasis. The score for changeability is sandbag: 2.15±0.87, Bi-presso: 4.35±0.67 When applied to hypoconscious patients, the score for compression maintenance is sandbag: 1.85±0.93, Bi-presso: 4.1±1.1 infection. The score for risk reduction was significantly higher in the sandbag: 1.75±091, Bi-Presso: 4.55±0.60 in all questionnaire items. (p <.05)
Conclusion :
In conclusion, Bi-presso is considered to be a safe and effective alternative hemostatic device that provides high satisfaction to patients and medical staff because it is possible to press the hemostasis site without risk of infection and bed stability compared to sandbags.
목차
abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 대상 및 방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 고찰
Ⅴ. 결론
Ⅵ. 참고 문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
경대퇴동맥 간동맥 색전술 후 천자 부위 지혈 시 보조 지혈기구 유용성 평가 : Easy Presso
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2017 .05
-
간동맥화학색전술 시술 후 대퇴동맥 천자부위 지혈을 위한 풍선형 지혈기구의 유용성
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2019 .05
-
대퇴동맥을 통한 뇌혈관조영술 또는 중재시술에 의한 동맥천자 후 천자 부위의 지혈을 위해 InnoSEALTM (이노씰 지혈용패드) 적용 후 지혈효과 및 안전성과 유효성 시험
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2018 .05
-
압박지혈밴드 적용이 골수검사 후 출혈 및 통증, 불편감에 미치는 효과
Asian Oncology Nursing
2025 .03
-
Neuro intervention 시술 후 사용한 지혈기구의 Complication 임상결과분석 : 7 Fr & 8 Fr Introducer sheath 대상으로
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2021 .06
-
Advances in the development of hemostatic biomaterials for medical application
생체재료학회지
2021 .12
-
말초 삽입형 중심정맥관 유지 관리
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2017 .05
-
중심정맥관을 통한 조영제 주입에 관한 가이드라인의 현황과 중심정맥관 지식정도의 고찰:관련된 제도와 교육의 필요성에 대하여
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2021 .06
-
Cardiovascular disease risk differences between bus company employees and general workers according to the Korean National Health Insurance Data
대한직업환경의학회지
2018 .05
-
Blood Transfusion after Emergency Hemostasis Surgery Affecting Surgical Site Infection Rate
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
ISO 10993 biological evaluation of novel hemostatic powder ? 4SEAL®
생체재료학회지
2022 .06
-
Endoscopic closure devices: A review of technique and application for hemostasis
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention
2019 .01
-
Hemostatic Materials during Operations
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Clinical application of a new hemostatic material using mussel-inspired catecholamine hemostat: A pilot study
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .02
-
Hemostasis in hepatectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Recent Developments in the Endoscopic Treatment of Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
Clinical Endoscopy
2016 .01
-
아동간호사의 말초정맥관 관련 간호수행에 영향을 미치는 요인
한국간호교육학회 학술대회
2019 .05
-
외상 환자에서 말초삽입 중심정맥관의 유용성: 단일기관의 초기경험
Journal of Acute Care Surgery
2017 .01
-
Risk for infection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2015 .11
-
버스 운전기사의 근무환경이 건강행태에 미치는 영향 : 음료섭취 실태를 중심으로
보건학논집
2015 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
혈액 투석용 동정맥루의 중재적 시술 후 천자부위 지혈 기구 개발에 관한 연구
석승진
,
김도성
,
김민규
외 3명
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2014
.05
간동맥화학색전술 시술 후 대퇴동맥 천자부위 지혈을 위한 풍선형 지혈기구의 유용성
임성규
,
김승기
,
박종수
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2019
.05
혈액응고인자를 함유하는 생체흡수성 폴리비닐피롤리돈 나노섬유시트 지혈제의 개발
심은정
,
고영광
,
김은진
외 2명
폴리머
2019
.07
대퇴동맥을 통한 뇌혈관조영술 또는 중재시술에 의한 동맥천자 후 천자 부위의 지혈을 위해 InnoSEALTM (이노씰 지혈용패드) 적용 후 지혈효과 및 안전성과 유효성 시험
손승환
,
남택민
,
박무석
외 5명
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2018
.05
경대퇴동맥 간동맥 색전술 후 천자 부위 지혈 시 보조 지혈기구 유용성 평가 : Easy Presso
문기철
,
황선문
,
김태일
외 1명
대한인터벤션영상기술학회지
2017
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-512-001760611