지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국일본어학회 일본어학연구 일본어학연구 제68집
- 발행연도
- 2021.6
- 수록면
- 141 - 157 (17page)
- DOI
- 10.14817/jlak.2021.68.141
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines the diachronic aspect of the Japanese formal nouns "koto" and "no" and their corresponding expressions in Korean. The data analyzed in this study are Japanese and Korean text books from the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century.
Results are as follows.
Firstly, reparding the distribution of semantic characteristics, "koto" was used as a real noun, ‘to-iu-kotoha’ patterns and modality usages. In particular, the formal noun use represents frequency of 72%. In particular, "no" shows, 37.2% of use as a formal noun, 31% as a substitute for a real noun, and 24.6% for a modality usage. This shows that ‘no’ was used evenly in a variety of usages. Next, in terms of corresponding expressiions in Korean, Japanese "koto" corresponds to "il",‘ki","um" noun clause,’ and ‘kes". Firstly, ‘il’ shows frequency of 38% and is used as a corresponding word in almost all usages. Secondly, the ‘ki, um’ noun clause shows frequency of 19.3%, mostly in nominal sentences. Thirdly, ‘kes’ is used when it is interchangeable with the ‘ki, um" noun clause or ‘il’. On the other hand, Japanese "no" mostly corresponds to the Korean ‘kes’. It"s frequency is 60%. This means that the meaning of the Korean "kes" is more diverse than that of the Japanese "no". In addition, in 21.3% of cases, verbs have been frequently used as corresponding words to "no"modality usages and ‘to-iu-noha’ patterns since the 1910s. The ‘ki, um’noun clause rarely appears with frequency of 6%.
Results are as follows.
Firstly, reparding the distribution of semantic characteristics, "koto" was used as a real noun, ‘to-iu-kotoha’ patterns and modality usages. In particular, the formal noun use represents frequency of 72%. In particular, "no" shows, 37.2% of use as a formal noun, 31% as a substitute for a real noun, and 24.6% for a modality usage. This shows that ‘no’ was used evenly in a variety of usages. Next, in terms of corresponding expressiions in Korean, Japanese "koto" corresponds to "il",‘ki","um" noun clause,’ and ‘kes". Firstly, ‘il’ shows frequency of 38% and is used as a corresponding word in almost all usages. Secondly, the ‘ki, um’ noun clause shows frequency of 19.3%, mostly in nominal sentences. Thirdly, ‘kes’ is used when it is interchangeable with the ‘ki, um" noun clause or ‘il’. On the other hand, Japanese "no" mostly corresponds to the Korean ‘kes’. It"s frequency is 60%. This means that the meaning of the Korean "kes" is more diverse than that of the Japanese "no". In addition, in 21.3% of cases, verbs have been frequently used as corresponding words to "no"modality usages and ‘to-iu-noha’ patterns since the 1910s. The ‘ki, um’noun clause rarely appears with frequency of 6%.
목차
Abstract
1. 들어가며
2. 선행 연구
3. 분석 자료 및 연구 방법
4. 일본어 형식명사 ‘こと, の’의 의미별 특성
5．일본어 ‘こと, の’에 대응하는 한국어의 양상 및 변화
6. 마치며
참고문헌
要旨
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-730-001752282