메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
趙炳植 (서울대학교)
저널정보
동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第155輯
발행연도
2021.6
수록면
361 - 404 (44page)
DOI
10.17856/jahs.2021.6.155.361

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article analyzes the processes, characteristics and realities of judicial reforms in Tianjin county(天津縣) during the New Policy Reform(新政) by focusing primarily on the new-type court, Tianjin Court(天津審判廳, TC). The reason why the TC was able to become China’s first “modern court” was that after the Tianjin sovereignty was transferred to the Qing dynasty in 1902, in order to reconstruct and strengthen the ruling system in Tianjin, Yuan Shikai(袁世凱), the Zhili Governor-General(直隷總督) attempted to reform the former judicial system, such as establishing the Tianjin County Judicial Bureau (天津縣發審局) and the Tianjin Police judicial bureau(南段巡警總局警讞局), which substitutingly handled the judicial function of the Tianjin magistrate.
As a new-type court, the TC took various unprecedented measures. First, in relation to the organization, the positions were subdivided according to the roles of personnel, and all the selections of personnel were conducted through examinations of legal and professional understanding. It also set up a detention house(拘留所) to detain unsentenced offenders, which traditionally did not exist. Second, regarding the litigation and trial system, new methods were introduced, such as the application of accusatory system (彈劾主義裁判), the principle of adjudication based on evidence (衆證主義) and the element of double jeopardy (一事不再理). The TC specified court costs according to the size of litigation not only to prevent personnel from corrupting but also to enable the involved to predict the cost.
In reality, however, existing judicial practices and perceptions still worked and constrained on these institutional reform. For example, the accusatory system could not be fully carried out due to the existing idea regard the lawyer as a litigant and the lack of understandings of the prosecution. In addition, the perception that only the confession was seen as complete evidence did not change. Furthermore, because of the public perception of proceeding and trials as a means of relieving their own regrets remained, the proceedings that ignored the formal regulation regarding trial and procedures frequently occurred, and the traditional method of settling the judgement depending on whether the parties accepted remained unchanged.
In short, the situation of the TC reveals the possibilities and limitations of the transitional times, in which a new system was being introduced to the traditional Chinese society.

목차

머리말
Ⅰ. 天津의 사법체제 재편과 審判廳 건설
Ⅱ. 새로운 재판 실험의 실상
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (84)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-910-001859940