지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第157輯
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 317 - 360 (44page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2021.12.157.317
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The resistance struggles of the famous Miao tribes in history need to be viewed regionally in order to accurately identify their reality or character. Until now, the constant resistance of the Miao tribes has been highlighted throughout the various regions, but when the regions are observed separately, the differences appear. The struggles in the Xiangxi (West Hunan) dealt with in this thesis peaked in the early 19th century, from the end of the Qianlong to the beginning of the Jiaqing, and after that, the power of the struggles significantly decreased.
What was it that almost put an end to the resistance struggles of the Miao in the Xiangxi region that has been going on since the Ming Dynasty? First of all, military pressure is inevitable. After the Qianlong-Jiaqing Miao uprising, the military facilities closely installed at the strategic points of the Miao Territory were better applied as a means of daily control as well as defense against Miao rebellion even more than in the Ming Dynasty. However, in order to operate these many facilities well, it is of course important to be filled with the troops, but it brought a financial problem to keep using military expenses to maintain this. When this uprising was almost suppressed, the regular army moved to the area due to the so-called White Lotus rebellion that took place in the contiguous areas of Hubei, Sichuan, and Shaanxi, etc., which increased the militia consisted of the Han or Miao a lot in Xiangxi. So that a different method to finance their expenses was devised. That is the Tuntian (military-agricultural land system).
The person who planned the installation of this Tuntian and put it into practice was Tongzhi(同知) Funai(傅鼐), the head of the Fenghuang Ting, and his concept of Tuntian was different from the usual ones in terms of land acquirement and operation. In general, the land in Tuntian was procured with the land of those who lost its owner due to war or took part in the rebellion. In addition to the above land, Funai wanted to make public land by coercing the landowners, Han and Miao alike, into contributing a lot of land in the name of Juntian (Equal-dividing land system). This plan was approved and started to be implemented at the Fenghuang in the 4th year of Jiaqing, but in the process of expanding it to the adjacent area, it met with a lot of resistance. In fact, there were a number of difficulties that even the emperor gave the comment with concern, but in the end it was achieved and implemented throughout the Miao territory in Xiangxi.
As a result, Tuntian in Xiangxi, the fields cultivated by soldiers, which was the original state of Tuntian, were much fewer than those cultivated by inhabitants, the Miao mostly. In other words, the local government became the giant landowner and the residents became the tenant. The rent was so severe that the Miaos fell to a level of eking out a scanty livelihood. However, recent studies in China explain that this system brought stability to the life of the Miao and calmed the uprising of the Miao in the region. Of course, it can be said that they were not in a predicament to the extent that it was difficult to continue their meals right away since they were tenants, but to think that they led a stable life is an overly favorable interpretation of the situation at the time. If that is the case, then it will not be possible to explain why the massive anti-rent struggle that followed or the movement to abolish Tuntian in the later era. Thus it would be more reasonable to view that the incentive to cause an uprising was less than a situation where it was difficult to live a life that was just trying to make a living.
In addition, it cannot be overlooked that this Tuntian system significantly reduced the land of the landowners of the Miao tribe, which resulted in a marked decrease in their influence in the area they had previously owned. This meant that they could no longer expect the same role they had played in the previous uprisings. This point should be noted as the cause of the subsidence of the resistance dynamics in the Xiangxi region. The large-scale uprising in the late 19th century that took place in the Southeastern Guizhou had a background in which influential persons remained alive in whatever way they worked, along with the extremely difficult life of the people. Moreover, this area was also a place where the wealth accumulated in the private sector through active forestry management. In a nutshell, the Tuntian system in the Xiangxi took away the wealth of the private sector by the government, which also waned the power to cause an uprising that could be called a rebellion.
What was it that almost put an end to the resistance struggles of the Miao in the Xiangxi region that has been going on since the Ming Dynasty? First of all, military pressure is inevitable. After the Qianlong-Jiaqing Miao uprising, the military facilities closely installed at the strategic points of the Miao Territory were better applied as a means of daily control as well as defense against Miao rebellion even more than in the Ming Dynasty. However, in order to operate these many facilities well, it is of course important to be filled with the troops, but it brought a financial problem to keep using military expenses to maintain this. When this uprising was almost suppressed, the regular army moved to the area due to the so-called White Lotus rebellion that took place in the contiguous areas of Hubei, Sichuan, and Shaanxi, etc., which increased the militia consisted of the Han or Miao a lot in Xiangxi. So that a different method to finance their expenses was devised. That is the Tuntian (military-agricultural land system).
The person who planned the installation of this Tuntian and put it into practice was Tongzhi(同知) Funai(傅鼐), the head of the Fenghuang Ting, and his concept of Tuntian was different from the usual ones in terms of land acquirement and operation. In general, the land in Tuntian was procured with the land of those who lost its owner due to war or took part in the rebellion. In addition to the above land, Funai wanted to make public land by coercing the landowners, Han and Miao alike, into contributing a lot of land in the name of Juntian (Equal-dividing land system). This plan was approved and started to be implemented at the Fenghuang in the 4th year of Jiaqing, but in the process of expanding it to the adjacent area, it met with a lot of resistance. In fact, there were a number of difficulties that even the emperor gave the comment with concern, but in the end it was achieved and implemented throughout the Miao territory in Xiangxi.
As a result, Tuntian in Xiangxi, the fields cultivated by soldiers, which was the original state of Tuntian, were much fewer than those cultivated by inhabitants, the Miao mostly. In other words, the local government became the giant landowner and the residents became the tenant. The rent was so severe that the Miaos fell to a level of eking out a scanty livelihood. However, recent studies in China explain that this system brought stability to the life of the Miao and calmed the uprising of the Miao in the region. Of course, it can be said that they were not in a predicament to the extent that it was difficult to continue their meals right away since they were tenants, but to think that they led a stable life is an overly favorable interpretation of the situation at the time. If that is the case, then it will not be possible to explain why the massive anti-rent struggle that followed or the movement to abolish Tuntian in the later era. Thus it would be more reasonable to view that the incentive to cause an uprising was less than a situation where it was difficult to live a life that was just trying to make a living.
In addition, it cannot be overlooked that this Tuntian system significantly reduced the land of the landowners of the Miao tribe, which resulted in a marked decrease in their influence in the area they had previously owned. This meant that they could no longer expect the same role they had played in the previous uprisings. This point should be noted as the cause of the subsidence of the resistance dynamics in the Xiangxi region. The large-scale uprising in the late 19th century that took place in the Southeastern Guizhou had a background in which influential persons remained alive in whatever way they worked, along with the extremely difficult life of the people. Moreover, this area was also a place where the wealth accumulated in the private sector through active forestry management. In a nutshell, the Tuntian system in the Xiangxi took away the wealth of the private sector by the government, which also waned the power to cause an uprising that could be called a rebellion.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 淸代 湘西 지역 苗亂의 槪況
Ⅱ. 방어설비의 修築
Ⅲ. 屯田의 실시
Ⅳ. 苗亂의 동력 상실
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (79)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
수원 사대부 李奭祚 『輯說』의 均田論
역사민속학
2016 .06
-
淸 嘉慶帝의 親政 시작과 人事
이화사학연구
2020 .01
-
漢代 河西지역의 생태환경과 農耕생산의 전개
중국고중세사연구
2022 .11
-
元代의 農政과 屯田策 : 쿠빌라이期를 중심으로
중국사연구
2016 .01
-
중국의 도시화와 공공토지 사유화
역사비평
2016 .08
-
17세기 강화도 鎭堡의 운영과 屯田策의 추진
한국사연구
2017 .03
-
정조시대 壯勇營外營의 兵農一致 군제개혁 구상과 屯田經營
한국사연구
2015 .03
-
소용돌이 속에서 만난 엘리엇과 포우
T. S. 엘리엇연구
2024 .01
-
전통, 제국과 금본위제—T. S. 엘리엇의 로이즈 은행 근무
T. S. 엘리엇연구
2023 .01
-
5·18항쟁 기록물의 생성과 유통
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
For Whom the Line is Drawn: Korean Indigenous Conceptions of Boundary in the 19th Century and Changes in the Colonial Period
Korea Journal
2020 .12
-
러일전쟁 직후 일본인 지주의 한국 진출 ―『군산농사월보』의 검토를 중심으로 ―
사림
2015 .01
-
『상두지』의 둔전론 -둔전의 조성과 둔졸의 운용을 중심으로-
한국실학연구
2020 .01
-
최홍일의 <눈물 젖은 두만강> 연작 연구
한중인문학연구
2016 .01
-
갑오정권의 농업정책
이화사학연구
2016 .01
-
부병제로 고려사회의 해명을 시도하다
한국사학보
2017 .05
-
Ecliptic Revolution of the ‘Un-landed’ and ‘Landed’ in Shakespeare’s King Lear
영어영문학
2021 .08
-
한말 명례궁장토의 운영과 국가의 소유권 정리 : 충청남도 아산군 이서면 우평 명례궁장토를 중심으로
한국민족문화
2015 .05
-
李覯의 經濟改革思想
역사문화연구
2020 .01
-
대한제국기 김가진의 충주지역 토지 소유와 의의
한국독립운동사연구
2017 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-910-000211235