메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
여혜진 (Architecture & Urban Research Institute)
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第56卷 第4號(通卷 第257號)
발행연도
2021.8
수록면
220 - 243 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to suggest policy implications for the reorganization of spatial planning systems regarding planning autonomy in the era of decentralized planning powers. The research findings are as follows. First, German planning autonomy is based on the integration of the Constitution, as well as local autonomy and spatial planning systems. Second, in the German spatial planning system, non-statutory planning tools not only play a complementary role for statutory planning tools, but also in the discretionary planning activities of state and local governments. Third, as a minimum administrative unit, gemeinde has the freedom to form a spatial structure and autonomy to operate various non-statutory planning tools under the comprehensively delegated autonomous legislative power. Fourth, the use of non-statutory planning tools is considered by local planning culture rather than administrative bureaucratic practices. Fifth, although the operational characters of non-statutory planning tools cannot be standardized, they have universal features regarding the discriminatory operation of state and gemeinde, complementary role for statutory planning tools, legal basis, recommendations of the federal government for spatial policy guidelines, and self-binding effectiveness of the administration. Sixth, non-statutory planning tools become effective based on the collaborative consultative process among councils, citizens, professionals, local organizations in administrative support. Hence, designing an appropriate procedure that enables stakeholders such as local councils and citizens to participate in the planning process is important as a premise of the non-statutory planning process. This study intends to suggest legal logic for reorganizing the Korean spatial planning system and implications for the introduction of non-statutory planning tools. Korea needs to structure the legal logic of spatial planning system reorganization regarding the substantive transfer of participatory control rights based on the definition of planning autonomy and the upward distribution of powers through participation by local councils and residents. To respond to the new role and flexible operation of the spatial planning system, it was suggested that non-statutory planning tools can establish the operational direction to complement the statutory plan.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 독일 공간계획체계 및 계획도구의 구성
Ⅲ. 독일 비법정 계획도구 운영사례 분석
Ⅳ. 독일 비법정 계획도구 관련 계획자치권 규정 분석
V. 결론
인용문헌 References

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0