메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jang, Yoonjeung (University of Seoul) Go, Seungwook (University of Seoul)
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第56卷 第6號(通卷 第259號)
발행연도
2021.11
수록면
53 - 72 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Physical residential environments and residential satisfaction are not only inconsistent, but there are still differences with each other, and identifying these characteristics is a significant part of the fundamental data of customized housing policies. This study aims to determine the types of discrepancies and analyze the determinants of discrepancies between physical residential environment and residential satisfaction. We analyzed residential satisfaction and physical residential environment using resident review data of 3,871 apartments in Seoul and public data on the 5,665 basic spatial unit in Seoul. As a result of the analysis, first, the agreement between residential satisfaction and the physical residential environments was determined to be inconsistent. Second, using the spatial distribution and the characteristics of the residential satisfaction in the residential environments, a few residential satisfaction heuristics were identified that affect an individual’s cognitive, and emotional behavior. Third, it was confirmed that the level of discrepancy was high when the residential apartments got older. In contrast, when the “residence size” and “residence value” were both low, the level of discrepancy was high. Furthermore, the level of discrepancy was high when public transportation access was high, whereas the level of discrepancy was high when bus access was low. Therefore, individual value judgments or hedonic value judgments were the primary determinants of the discrepancies, and the physical characteristics were rather heuristic, which can be perceived and acted upon differently depending on the conditions.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Literature Review
Ⅲ. Methodology
Ⅳ. Results and Discussion
Ⅴ. Conclusions and Implications
References

참고문헌 (65)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-539-000066137