지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (10)
2020
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this study, I have surveyed a variety of meaning uses of ‘SOREDE’ in written language. The result is summarized in the following three points. First, ‘SOREDE’ in written language may be validated by three meanings (‘Causal conjunction,’ ‘Causal conjunction∩Non‐causal conjunction,’ ‘Non causal conjunction’). This can be done on the grounds of “the cause−result,” and, additionally the non causal conjunction can be divided into the categories of development and switch (topic switch/re‐reference) based on the consistency of the topic in the context. Second, ‘SOREDE’ in written language refers to different characteristics in spoken language. In other words, the results in which the use of the ‘Causal conjunction∩Non causal conjunction’ exists and the use of the request of the Non causal conjunction does not exist in ‘SOREDE’ are different between written and spoken language. Third, in the case of ‘SOREDE’ in written language, I found that the position (the beginning or the middle of the paragraph) and the presence of a comma or the lack thereof in the text have an influence on each function. Although this study is intended for limited use cases of ‘SOREDE,’there will be some positive implications that could produce meaningful results through further investigations. Especially, such results can highlight clear differences in basic documents to distinguish between similar expressions such as ‘SOSITE,’ ‘DAKARA,’ and so on.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0