메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정민 (계명대학교) 강유진 (계명대학교) 김은수 (경북대학교) 이유진 (계명대학교) 박경식 (계명대학교) 조광범 (계명대학교) 정민규 (경북대학교) 이현석 (경북대학교) 김은영 (가톨릭대학교) 정진태 (가톨릭대학교) 장병익 (영남대학교) 김경옥 (영남대학교) 정윤진 (대구파티마병원) 양창헌 (동국대학교) 전성우 (경북대학교)
저널정보
대한장연구학회 Intestinal research Intestinal research Vol.14 No.4
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
351 - 357 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: Establishment of a colonoscopy reporting system is a prerequisite to determining and improving quality. This study aimed to investigate colonoscopists’ opinions and the actual situation of a colonoscopy reporting system in a clinicalpractice in southeastern area of Korea and to assess the factors predictive of an inadequate reporting system. Methods: Physicianswho performed colonoscopies in the Daegu-Gyeongbuk province of Korea and were registered with the Korean Societyof Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) were interviewed via mail about colonoscopy reporting systems using a standardizedquestionnaire. Results: Of 181 endoscopists invited to participate, 125 responded to the questionnaires (response rate,69%). Most responders were internists (105/125, 84%) and worked in primary clinics (88/125, 70.4%). Seventy-one specialists(56.8%) held board certifications for endoscopy from the KSGE. A median of 20 colonoscopies (interquartile range, 10–47)was performed per month. Although 88.8% of responders agreed that a colonoscopy reporting system is necessary, only 18.4%(23/125) had achieved the optimal reporting system level recommended by the Quality Assurance Task Group of the NationalColorectal Cancer Roundtable. One-third of endoscopists replied that they did not use a reporting document for the mainreasons of “too busy” and “inconvenience.” Non-endoscopy specialists and primary care centers were independent predictivefactors for failure to use a colonoscopy reporting system. Conclusions: The quality of colonoscopy reporting systems varieswidely and is considerably suboptimal in actual clinical practice settings in southeastern Korea, indicating considerable roomfor quality improvements in this field.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0