지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In commemoration of 30th year since the death of Antoine Berman, a French translator and translation scholar, this research analyzed his social identity and the roles that he played in forming translation studies as a field in France. To this end, the framework of reflexive sociology, proposed by a French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, was employed to explain how the field of translation studies operates and its agents interact within the field.
Taking a French writer and translator, Philippe Jaccottet, as his role model, Berman began his career as a literary translator to participate in the movement during the 1960s in Paris, which attempted to transform literature with translation. His translation of Augusto Roa Bastos’s Yo el Supremo into French enabled him to reflect on translation theories, which explained “embracing foreignness as it is” and “enriching the mother tongue through translation” and turned him into a renowned translation scholar.
He remained at the periphery of the French translation studies field in the 1980s whether it be either the social or the academic system. However, he always took the center of academic discussions, as he had conflicts with mainstream translation scholars and educational institutions, such as Jean-René Ladmiral, Henri Meschonnic and ESIT School, over what status the translation studies occupied in the academic institutions and what purpose translation should pursue. With his works on translation and lectures, he condemned the deformation tendencies observed in all types of literary translation. His poignant criticism against the French translating tradition of extreme domestication ushered in the ethical turn in translation studies.
Berman was able to contribute to the birth and development of the translation studies field in France thanks to his habitus as a literary innovator developed with his experience as a literary translator, as well as the symbolic capital of ethicality accumulated with his continuous criticism against the ethnocentric translation tradition in France. His peripheral position within the French field of translation studies also allowed him to stand against mainstream translation scholars. We, the author of the paper, also analyzed the social identity of ourselves to enhance reflective objectivity of this study.
Taking a French writer and translator, Philippe Jaccottet, as his role model, Berman began his career as a literary translator to participate in the movement during the 1960s in Paris, which attempted to transform literature with translation. His translation of Augusto Roa Bastos’s Yo el Supremo into French enabled him to reflect on translation theories, which explained “embracing foreignness as it is” and “enriching the mother tongue through translation” and turned him into a renowned translation scholar.
He remained at the periphery of the French translation studies field in the 1980s whether it be either the social or the academic system. However, he always took the center of academic discussions, as he had conflicts with mainstream translation scholars and educational institutions, such as Jean-René Ladmiral, Henri Meschonnic and ESIT School, over what status the translation studies occupied in the academic institutions and what purpose translation should pursue. With his works on translation and lectures, he condemned the deformation tendencies observed in all types of literary translation. His poignant criticism against the French translating tradition of extreme domestication ushered in the ethical turn in translation studies.
Berman was able to contribute to the birth and development of the translation studies field in France thanks to his habitus as a literary innovator developed with his experience as a literary translator, as well as the symbolic capital of ethicality accumulated with his continuous criticism against the ethnocentric translation tradition in France. His peripheral position within the French field of translation studies also allowed him to stand against mainstream translation scholars. We, the author of the paper, also analyzed the social identity of ourselves to enhance reflective objectivity of this study.
목차
1. 서론
2. 부르디외의 성찰의 사회학과 학술장 이론
3. 베르만의 생애와 사회적 정체성
4. 프랑스 번역학 장의 탄생 및 형성
5. 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (71)
참고문헌 신청
이영훈 / 2013 / 한국번역학사 기술을 위한 전제와 시론 / 번역학연구 14(2):187~222
이영훈 / 2015 / 앙트완 베르만의 번역학 지형도 / 한국프랑스학논집 91:495~521
이영훈 / 2018 / 앙트완 베르만의 번역이론에서 ‘lettre’의 개념 / 코기토 84:149~189
이영훈 / 2019 / 베르만 대(對) 메쇼닉 - 번역학, 번역비평, 벤야민을 중심으로 한 비교 고찰 / 불어불문학연구 (120):453~486
이영훈 / 2021 / 번역사회학 개관: 피에르 부르디외의 사회학 이론을 기반으로 / 번역・언어・기술 2:45~69
이영훈 / 2015 / 앙트완 베르만의 번역학 지형도 / 한국프랑스학논집 91:495~521
이영훈 / 2018 / 앙트완 베르만의 번역이론에서 ‘lettre’의 개념 / 코기토 84:149~189
이영훈 / 2019 / 베르만 대(對) 메쇼닉 - 번역학, 번역비평, 벤야민을 중심으로 한 비교 고찰 / 불어불문학연구 (120):453~486
이영훈 / 2021 / 번역사회학 개관: 피에르 부르디외의 사회학 이론을 기반으로 / 번역・언어・기술 2:45~69
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-800-000131982