메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국스포츠심리학회 한국스포츠심리학회지 한국스포츠심리학회지 제26권 제1호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
61 - 72 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: A Quality of Life Survey has been developed and used in physical activity and health promotionresearch, based on a working definition of Quality of Life as: a subjective, multidimensional, integrative constructthat reflects optimal well-being and positive health(Gill, et al., 2011). In this study, we developed a Koreanversion of the Quality of Life(QoL) Survey and assessed its validity. Methods: We developed the Korean versionusing established cross-cultural translation and validation techniques, with related QoL and physical activitymeasures used for validity. The first steps were developing an initial Korean version of the QoL measure througha series of translations and back-translations, and giving both the English and Korean versions to universitystudents and community members who speak both Korean and English(N= 39). Next, to establish reliability andvalidity, we recruited Korean university students participants(N=351) for confirmatory factor analysis, reliabilityand item analysis with the overall measure and each sub-domain scale, as well as concurrent/construct validityanalysis through relationships with conceptually-related measures(WHOQOL-BREF), Satisfaction with Life Scale,and physical activity to explore construct validity. Results: Correlations between Korean and English(N=39) were.382~.919, Cronbach's α of Korean version is .95, English version is .93. Confirmatory factor analysis(N=351) with7 sub-factors showed good model fit(RMSEA .06, CFI .91, TLI .90). Cronbach’s α for sub-scales ranged from.65~.92, correlations with WHOQOL-BRIEF from .30~.60(p<.01), correlations with SWLS from .33~.48(p<.01). Conclusion: Results support the validity and reliability of Korean version of QoL survey.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0