메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
마승범 (홍익대)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회논문집 大韓建築學會論文集 第38卷 第3號(通卷 第401號)
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
167 - 178 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Autonomous architecture focuses on the system of formal elements that are essential in architecture. Both Peter Eisenman and Valerio Olgiati treat the physical and functional elements in architecture such as columns, slabs, walls as the basic materials in architectural design; the architectural idea, or internal logic of design, governs the shape and the arrangement of elements. Both architects refuse to adopt extra-architectural discourses as it relates to social, economic, and political approaches. Even if arguments in philosophy and art are accommodated, they are retranslated into architectural rhetoric where formal and spatial analysis override historical or theoretical ideas. Here are the differences between the two architects: Peter Eisenman pursues the completeness of the formalistic system of the project itself whereas the existential sense-making experience of the beholder that provokes the imagination and metaphysical thinking is of paramount importance to Valerio Olgiati. Peter Eisenman produces architectural meaning by adding or duplicating unfunctional, but still fundamental elements; and the axonometric format that shows the process of transformation of architectural elements is preferred. However, Valerio Olgiati designs buildings by dividing one entity with one idea, and the design process is concealed to intrigue the beholders. Plans, sections, and elevations stimulate the intellectual imagination, and realistic renderings with a poetic atmosphere are favored. Lastly, Peter Eisenman is relatively indifferent to physical buildings since his true architecture is already completed in the drawings. But Valerio Olgiati concentrates on the physicality and construction since it determines the success of the project. Their approaches of reserving the architectural territory by concentrating on the essential aspects of architecture makes one question the way of doing architecture in practice and within academia in today’s ever-changing world.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 공통점
3. 차이점
4. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-540-001061391