메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject
Humanities
General Humanities History Philosophy Religious Studies Linguistics and Literature Other Humanities
Social science
General Social Science Business Management Tourism Education Military Science Library and Information Science Law Sociology Journalism and Media Studies Psychological Science Political Science and Diplomacy Geography Public Administration Economics International Trade Anthropology Other Social Science
Natural science
General Natural Science Physics Biology Life Sciences Mathematics/Statistics Astronomy Earth Science Chemistry Other Natural Science
Engineering
General Engineering Architectural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Industrial Engineering Material/Energy Engineering Electrical and Electronic Engineering Marine and Ocean Engineering Chemical Engineering Computer Science Other Engineering
Medical science
General Medical Science Nursing Science Veterinary Pharmacy Traditional Korean Medicine Basic Medicine Clinical Medicine Other Medicine
Agriculture and Fishery
General Agriculture and Fishery Agriculture Fishery Science Food Science Forestry Animal Husbandry Marine Transportation Studies Other Agriculture and Fishery
Art and Kinesiology
General Arts Design Fine Arts Cosmetology Photography Music Fashion Kinesiology Performing Media Arts Other Arts and Kinesiology
Interdisciplinary Studies
Interdisciplinary Research Science and Technology Studies Brain and Cognitive Science Technology Policy Other Interdisciplinary Studies

KOR

The media policy debate over punitive damages for media reports : A discourse network analysis
Recommendations
Search
Questions

담론네트워크 분석을 통해 살펴본 언론보도에 대한 징벌적 손해배상 정책 논쟁

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Eun Cheol Choi (서울대학교) Sugmin Youn (서울대학교)
Journal
Korean Society For Journalism And Communication Studies Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies Vol.66 No.2 KCI Excellent Accredited Journal
Published
2022.4
Pages
5 - 69 (65page)
DOI
10.20879/kjjcs.2022.66.2.001

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
The media policy debate over punitive damages for media reports : A discourse network analysis
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Research history (2)

2022

The media policy debate over punitive damages for media reports : A discourse network analysis
Eun Cheol Choi ,  Sugmin Youn Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 2022.04 Academic journal
The media policy debate over punitive damages for media reports: A discourse network analysis
최은철 언론정보 2022.01 Thesis
  • Are you curious about the follow-up research of this article?
  • You can check more advanced research results through related academic papers or academic presentations.
  • Check the research history of this article

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Introducing punitive damages for media reports has in recent years become a media policy agenda that extends beyond the scope of legal debate. Prominent policy actors such as members of the National Assembly, administrative agencies, media companies, and civic groups participated in the policy debate and expressed their policy beliefs. The core policy values, such as relief from media damage and freedom of expression, collided. This study aimed to analyze the structure of the media policy debate over punitive damages for media reports in the early 2020s. Discourse network analysis was applied to determine the structure of the policy debate and its evolution over time. This study collected remarks on punitive damages for media reports and conducted content analysis to form two-mode network data that connect policy actors and beliefs. Next, the policy debate was divided into three periods, and network analysis techniques were employed to the discourse networks from each period to examine advocacy coalition, central actors and beliefs. The results are as follows: First, the polarization of the discourse network was remarkable. Although the size and composition of the coalitions changed, the conflict between the coalitions continued. Rather than converging to either side, they maintained an out-of-equilibrium state. Second, policy actors expressed their policy beliefs in a variety of ways. Lawmakers belonging to the ruling party and administrative agencies promoted punishment compensation policies, while opposition lawmakers, media industries, and experts tended to oppose these policies. Third, convergence of opinion occurred in a local manner. Discussions and seminars were consistently held, in which policy actors with differing opinions participated. As a result, media organizations, which consistently express opposing beliefs throughout the first and second phases, expressed their conditional acceptance of punitive damages in the third phase. The ruling party accepted the conditions and proposed a revision of the bill. However, after then, the ruling party had attempted to forcefully push the bill without sufficient deliberation, facing much opposition and criticism. Through research on the topography of the policy debate, this paper confirmed that the attempt to reform the media without gaining sufficient consensus only resulted in backlash from stakeholders and could not draw out any meaningful agreements. This implies that in order to solve the media problem, journalistic norms and practices must be elaborated in order to articulate what it means to regulate ‘fake news’. The discourse network analysis was suitable for grasping the dynamics of the policy debate over awarding punitive damages for media reports. To examine media policy debates, it is necessary to apply the framework to other policy issues as well.
#punitive damages #media policy #advocacy coalition #social network analysis #two-mode network #징벌배상 #미디어 정책 #정책옹호연합체 #사회연결망 #2-모드 네트워크

Contents

1. 문제의 제기
2. 기존 문헌 검토
3. 연구문제 및 연구방법
4. 연구결과
5. 논의
References
국문초록

References (0)

Add References
If the reference is being serviced by DBpia, please register through [Add Reference]

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

A Critical Approach to the Arguments Against the Introduction of Punitive Damages in the News Media
Sung Ock Yoon Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies 2022 .05
Comparison of the Disaster Accidents Agendas by Public and Commercial Broadcasting : Using Sewol Ferry News’s Keywords and Network Analysis on KBS and Channel A
Wansoo Lee ,  Myungil Choi Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 2022 .12
A Review on the Introduction of Robot Tax for Future Generations
Na ,  Hyung Jong KOREAN INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING REVIEW 2022 .10
Media Representation of Community Family as a Fictive Kin and Youth Discourse: A Narrative Analysis of Television Documentaries
Hwanhee Kim Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 2022 .06
Media reports and public perceptions of ‘North Korean refugees’ : A study on linguistic sentiment according to the political inclinations of the government and the media since 1998
Jongmin Pa ,  k ,  Ho Jun Joo and others 2 Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 2022 .02

Recently viewed articles

Implicational Partial Gaggle Logics and Matrix Semantics
Yang EunsukKorean Association for Logic2023.06
 정신장애인 고용실태와 고용촉진 방안에 관한 토론
설진화Korea Academy Of Mental Health Social Work2006.11

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.