지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제123호
- 발행연도
- 2022.3
- 수록면
- 171 - 224 (54page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2022.03.123.171
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is a state-wide policy of the Joseon government regarding the “Hwangjo-in figures” (‘People from the Empire who naturalized as Joseon citizens’) that was actively promoted in 18th century Korea. The specific issue examined here is how the Joseon society perceived the Gong house members(孔氏) in each period, how it treated them, how the Gong figures came to regard themselves in response to the Joseon society’s such treatment of them, and how their identity changed accordingly.
Till the mid-17th century, it was not the Joseon society’s general perception to view figures with the last name Gong(孔) living on the Korean peninsula as descendants of the ancient Chinese sage Confucius himself. Even the Gong community never showed a consensus in either way, supporting or denying such perception to begin with. Later on, however, such perception began to be reflected in certain genealogy records and then further spread throughout the Joseon society. Even the Joseon government began to accept this newborn social belief during the reign of Sukjong, and provided benefits (for example, to be exempted from state duties) to the Gong figures, under the name of respecting their status as ‘Descendants of the Grand Sage(大聖後裔).’
But the Gong figures were yet to receive full recognition as Confucius’ descendants, until the reign of King Jeongjo. Regarding several efforts of certain ‘Chinese-in-Joseon’ figures to secure proofs -such as genealogical records or pictures- from Qing, the Joseon government actively supported them if they were made by original Ming citizens who had earlier come to Joseon and got naturalized (who could also be called as Hwangjo-in a narrower sense). On the other hand, regarding similar efforts made by the Gong figures, the Joseon government sometimes acted in a completely opposite manner. Then in 1792, 16th year of King Jeongjo’s reign, the Gong figures in Joseon were officially designated as ‘Descendants of Confucius’ (and as Hwangjo-in in literally a broader sense), and their official home region(‘Gwan-hyang, 貫鄕’) was changed from Chang’weon to Gokbu. Commemoration projects were initiated while the government changed its previous stance of being uncooperative to totally supporting the import of relevant materials from Qing. This sort of turnaround also heavily affected the Gong figures in Joseon, who finally came to perceive themselves as members of the Gokbu Gong House. Such new perceptions were also reflected in the Gong House genealogy records published in this period.
Till the mid-17th century, it was not the Joseon society’s general perception to view figures with the last name Gong(孔) living on the Korean peninsula as descendants of the ancient Chinese sage Confucius himself. Even the Gong community never showed a consensus in either way, supporting or denying such perception to begin with. Later on, however, such perception began to be reflected in certain genealogy records and then further spread throughout the Joseon society. Even the Joseon government began to accept this newborn social belief during the reign of Sukjong, and provided benefits (for example, to be exempted from state duties) to the Gong figures, under the name of respecting their status as ‘Descendants of the Grand Sage(大聖後裔).’
But the Gong figures were yet to receive full recognition as Confucius’ descendants, until the reign of King Jeongjo. Regarding several efforts of certain ‘Chinese-in-Joseon’ figures to secure proofs -such as genealogical records or pictures- from Qing, the Joseon government actively supported them if they were made by original Ming citizens who had earlier come to Joseon and got naturalized (who could also be called as Hwangjo-in a narrower sense). On the other hand, regarding similar efforts made by the Gong figures, the Joseon government sometimes acted in a completely opposite manner. Then in 1792, 16th year of King Jeongjo’s reign, the Gong figures in Joseon were officially designated as ‘Descendants of Confucius’ (and as Hwangjo-in in literally a broader sense), and their official home region(‘Gwan-hyang, 貫鄕’) was changed from Chang’weon to Gokbu. Commemoration projects were initiated while the government changed its previous stance of being uncooperative to totally supporting the import of relevant materials from Qing. This sort of turnaround also heavily affected the Gong figures in Joseon, who finally came to perceive themselves as members of the Gokbu Gong House. Such new perceptions were also reflected in the Gong House genealogy records published in this period.
목차
머리말
1. 조선후기 ‘황조인’ 개념의 등장과 범주 확대
2. 정조 16년(1792) 이전 조선 내 공씨에 대한 인식과 관련 정책의 추이
3. 정조 16년(1792) 이후 조선 내 공씨를 둘러싼 변화와 ‘곡부 공씨’의 탄생
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공안체시(公安體詩)의 특성과 의의
중국어문학지
2016 .01
-
공인제도 혁파 후 분원 공인의 분화와 직업 · 자본의 변화(1895~1910)
역사와현실
2017 .09
-
龔自珍의 經學論과 歷史認識
중국사연구
2016 .01
-
前漢 시기 爵位와 贖罪의 관계 - 貢禹의 “除贖罪之法”에 관한 논의를 중심으로 -
중국고중세사연구
2025 .02
-
원불교 四大奉公會의 역사적 변천, 그 특징과 성격
원불교사상과종교문화
2020 .03
-
曾鞏의 歷史觀과 詠史詩
중국학
2018 .01
-
18세기 후반 역사지리 인식과 유득공의 『사군지』
역사와현실
2022 .06
-
공안협의소설과 문화콘텐츠— 포청천 캐릭터 콘텐츠 기획을 위한 프로젝트 기반 수업모델을 중심으로
중국소설논총
2021 .08
-
9세기 전반 신라의 정치동향과 충공의 역할
한국고대사연구
2016 .09
-
지역문학관 상설 전시실 조성 방안 연구— 기형도문학관을 중심으로
한국문예창작
2017 .01
-
행복할 수 없는 그녀들의 목소리를 듣기 - 박완서 소설 속 미군의 아내들
한국문학논총
2021 .12
-
불완전한 명문의 복원 : 晉公정과 晉公盤
중국고중세사연구
2016 .08
-
만청 공안소설의 서사 변화 고찰－『이공안기문』을 중심으로
한중인문학연구
2020 .01
-
한국전쟁 이후 개성주민의 삶의 변화 연구
통일인문학
2016 .06
-
일제강점 이전 전라도 천주교의 교육현황과 활동
전북사학
2015 .01
-
장공 김재준의 마태복음 5:5 해석에 관한 연구: “범우주적 사랑의 공동체”의 성서 해석학을 위하여
신학연구
2021 .12
-
만화가 고바야시 요시노리의 쇼와 천황에 대한 인식
일본문화연구
2024 .01
-
순천 초연정의 문화사적 의의 고찰
남도문화연구
2021 .08
-
用夏九曲과 毅堂 門人 - 李元雨?梁在明?柳芝赫을 중심으로 -
동방한문학
2021 .01
-
蔡??及其“?恨”思想 - 以《紫玉?》?主兼?《琵琶重光?》
한중언어문화연구
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0