지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제123호
- 발행연도
- 2022.3
- 수록면
- 337 - 390 (54page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2022.03.123.337
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the Korean war, and after the Seoul city was retrieved from North Korean troops, the South Korean government began exacting punishments on collaborators who cooperated with the North Korean troops. In the Seoul area, not only open but also very public mass executions called ‘wholesale slaughters’ served as a fearful display for the population. At the time many reporters affiliated with foreign press, as well as the United Nations force, were present in the Seoul area, and the news of a mass execution would instantly be treated as international reports, but they were summarily silenced by South Korean authorities. In the meantime, throughout local areas, swift judgments and summary executions -accompanied by private and harsh punishments- were commonly occurring practices for known collaborators. In the wake of searching for and eliminating DPKR’s remnants, local left-wing supporters and partisan guerrillas, a lot of civilians were killed as well.
Meanwhile, the South Korean government’s treatment of social elites or leaders in private and public sectors, such as national representatives(members of the national assembly), academic professors, literature authors and cultural figures, who all collaborated with North Korean authorities or troops in several capacities, were so tolerant and benevolent compared to the treatment ordinary citizens received from the government. Some of them were indeed judged or executed, but most of them were pardoned without any clear explanation.
The punishment of collaborators by the South Korean government was triggered by many reasons. First, there was not only an administrative need for public punishment but also a practical necessity to ensure public security, as well as a sense of anger and revenge. Secondly, such punishments were also a continuation from overly excessive violence and tendency to suppress any kind of social disturbance that had continued since the year 1948. And finally, there was an ultimate political need to have the public turn a blind eye to the administration’s glaring political failures.
There were differences in the South Korean government’s punishment of collaborators, not only between celebrities and ordinary people but between residents of the capital city and other local regions. Such polarity was caused by a series of elements. According to the nature of certain cases, some of them were opened to the public while some cases even involved foreign countries’ troops, media and governments. How the war was progressing also had to do with certain cases which unfolded as they did. And there was the issue of wartime propaganda, and the need to win over certain portions of the public, that also contributed to the eventual culmination of some cases. The overall polarity between cases did leave a long lasting legacy and repercussions on the post-war Korean society.
Meanwhile, the South Korean government’s treatment of social elites or leaders in private and public sectors, such as national representatives(members of the national assembly), academic professors, literature authors and cultural figures, who all collaborated with North Korean authorities or troops in several capacities, were so tolerant and benevolent compared to the treatment ordinary citizens received from the government. Some of them were indeed judged or executed, but most of them were pardoned without any clear explanation.
The punishment of collaborators by the South Korean government was triggered by many reasons. First, there was not only an administrative need for public punishment but also a practical necessity to ensure public security, as well as a sense of anger and revenge. Secondly, such punishments were also a continuation from overly excessive violence and tendency to suppress any kind of social disturbance that had continued since the year 1948. And finally, there was an ultimate political need to have the public turn a blind eye to the administration’s glaring political failures.
There were differences in the South Korean government’s punishment of collaborators, not only between celebrities and ordinary people but between residents of the capital city and other local regions. Such polarity was caused by a series of elements. According to the nature of certain cases, some of them were opened to the public while some cases even involved foreign countries’ troops, media and governments. How the war was progressing also had to do with certain cases which unfolded as they did. And there was the issue of wartime propaganda, and the need to win over certain portions of the public, that also contributed to the eventual culmination of some cases. The overall polarity between cases did leave a long lasting legacy and repercussions on the post-war Korean society.
목차
머리말
1. 북한 점령기 선전매체에 등장한 유명인들
2. 수복 후 한국정부의 가혹한 부역자 처벌 정책
3. 문화인 · 엘리트에 대한 관용 정책
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
남베트남 패망 40년, 베트남전쟁과 한국
역사비평
2015 .05
-
Exclusive Pakkey and Multidimensionality
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2022 .11
-
The magnitude of articulatory gestures for the glide /w/ in Korean: Implications for the phonological representation of /w/
음성음운형태론연구
2020 .12
-
1910년대 미국의 한국에 대한 인식과 3.1운동에 대한 반응
역사와실학
2021 .04
-
Exhaustivity of –(n)un in Korean
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2017 .06
-
재일동포사회를 통해서 본 한국다문화사회의 비판적 고찰
일본문화학보
2016 .02
-
What is the Final Goal of Punishment and Forgiveness?
윤리연구
2015 .05
-
학생들은 친일 반민족 행위자를 어떻게 생각할까?
역사와교육
2020 .01
-
『尙書』 刑政의 이념과 현실 적용
한국한문학연구
2016 .06
-
케사레 베까리아(Cesare Beccaria)의 사형폐지론에 대한 비판적 연구
신학지남
2015 .03
-
1990년대 초 한국인들의 대미 인식에 영향을 미친 요인들
역사교육논집
2015 .01
-
조선인민군 충원정책의 변화와 정체성 형성(1948~1950)
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
데탕트와 한반도, 실현되지 못한 제3의 길
역사비평
2018 .08
-
‘중화민국’의 한국전쟁 참전활동 論考
중국근현대사연구
2021 .09
-
한국 드라마에 반영된 ‘징벌’ 서사의 전통 수용 및 변이 양상 - <마을 - 아치아라의 비밀>을 중심으로 -
인문과학연구
2016 .01
-
베트남전쟁 한국군 철수와 국내의 여론·정치 동향
역사와현실
2020 .06
-
사형제도의 윤리적 정당성 : 사형에 대한 응보론적 논증을 중심으로
철학연구
2018 .02
-
淸代 후반 대만의 사법행정과 換刑 : 淡新檔案의 강도 사건을 일례로
코기토
2024 .10
-
『투사신문』을 통해 본 재북 남로당계의 선전 활동 - 1948~50년을 중심으로
역사와현실
2024 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0